Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107574›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Evaluation of Social Isolation, Loneliness, and Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Women in the US.

Natalie M Golaszewski, Andrea Z LaCroix, Job G Godino, Matthew A Allison, JoAnn E Manson, Jennifer J King, Julie C Weitlauf, Jennifer W Bea, Lorena Garcia, Candyce H Kroenke and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07576855 (Strengthening Bonds), which is not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07576855 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Strengthening Bonds: A Telephone Reminiscence Intervention to Reduce Social Isolation and Improve Mental Health in Rural Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ConnecticutRan2026 to 2027Enrolled170ConditionsMental HealthArmsTelephone Reminiscence Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natalie M GolaszewskiHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego.
Andrea Z LaCroixHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego.
Job G GodinoHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego.
Matthew A AllisonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer J KingDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
Julie C WeitlaufVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jennifer W BeaDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
Lorena GarciaUniversity of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis.
Candyce H KroenkeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Nazmus SaquibDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Al Bukayriyah, Saudi Arabia.
Brad CannellDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health-Dallas Campus.
Steve NguyenHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego.
John BellettiereHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego.

Funding

Sedentary Behaviour Interrupted: Acute, medium and long-term effects on biomarkers of healthy aging, physical function and mortalityP01AG052352 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2017 to 2022
$9.0M
Social networks and disparities in health behaviors and breast cancer outcomes in immigrant womenR01CA230440 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2019 to 2024
$3.2M
An Electronic Health Record-Based Tool to Identify Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients at Risk of Low Social SupportR01CA253028 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2020 to 2025
$2.6M
Novel computational techniques to detect the relationship between sitting patterns and metabolic syndrome in existing cohort studies.R01DK114945 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NATARAJAN, LOKI · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
Improving the Health of Aging Women and Men.T32AG058529 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230440NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253028NIA NIH HHS P01 AG052352NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058529NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Social isolation and loneliness are increasing public health concerns and have been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among older adults. Objective: To examine the associations of social isolation and loneliness with incident CVD in a large cohort of postmenopausal women and whether social support moderated these associations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study, conducted from March 2011 through March 2019, included community-living US women aged 65 to 99 years from the Women's Health Initiative Extension Study II who had no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary heart disease. Exposures: Social isolation and loneliness were ascertained using validated questionnaires. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was major CVD, which was physician adjudicated using medical records and included coronary heart disease, stroke, and death from CVD. Continuous scores of social isolation and loneliness were analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD were calculated for women with high social isolation and loneliness scores (midpoint of the upper half of the distribution) vs those with low scores (midpoint of the lower half of the distribution) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, educational level, and depression and then adding relevant health behavior and health status variables. Questionnaire-assessed social support was tested as a potential effect modifier. Results: Among 57 825 women (mean [SD] age, 79.0 [6.1] years; 89.1% White), 1599 major CVD events occurred over 186 762 person-years. The HR for the association of high vs low social isolation scores with CVD was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.13-1.23), and the HR for the association of high vs low loneliness scores with CVD was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.10-1.18). The HRs after additional adjustment for health behaviors and health status were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.03-1.12; 8.0% higher risk) for social isolation and 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01-1.09; 5.0% higher risk) for loneliness. Women with both high social isolation and high loneliness scores had a 13.0% to 27.0% higher risk of incident CVD than did women with low social isolation and low loneliness scores. Social support was not a significant effect modifier of the associations (social isolation × social support: r, -0.18; P = .86; loneliness × social support: r, 0.78; P = .48). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, social isolation and loneliness were independently associated with modestly higher risk of CVD among postmenopausal women in the US, and women with both social isolation and loneliness had greater CVD risk than did those with either exposure alone. The findings suggest that these prevalent psychosocial processes merit increased attention for prevention of CVD in older women, particularly in the era of COVID-19.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial IsolationSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidencePostmenopauseProspective StudiesUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID35107574
PMCPMC8811637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.