Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107548›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2021

The 6-Minute Walk Test predicts long-term physical improvement among intensive care unit survivors: a prospective cohort study.

Regis Goulart Rosa, Camila Dietrich, Enio Luiz Tschiedel do Valle, Denise Souza, Luciana Tagliari, Mariana Mattioni, Túlio Frederico Tonietto, Rosa da Rosa, Mirceli Goulart Barbosa, Gisele Agustini Lovatel and 15 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Regis Goulart RosaHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-9866
Camila DietrichUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Enio Luiz Tschiedel do ValleHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Denise SouzaHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Luciana TagliariHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Mariana MattioniHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Túlio Frederico ToniettoHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Rosa da RosaHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Mirceli Goulart BarbosaUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Gisele Agustini LovatelUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Pedro Dal LagoUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Eubrando Silvestre OliveiraHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Daniel SganzerlaHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Juliana M S AndradeHospital Ernesto Dornelles - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-8892
Paula BertoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Paulo Ricardo CardosoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Evelin Carneiro SanchezHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Maicon FalavignaHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-6837
Juçara G MaccariHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Gabriela RechHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Caroline RobinsonHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Daniel SchneiderHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Patrícia de LeonHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Lívia BiasonHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.
Cassiano TeixeiraHospital Moinhos de Vento - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-3799
Hospital Moinhos de Vento · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital Ernesto Dornelles · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the ability of the 6-Minute Walk Test to predict long-term physical functional status improvement among intensive care unit survivors.

methodsThirty-two intensive care unit survivors were prospectively evaluated from February 2017 to August 2018 in a post-intensive care unit outpatient clinic in Brazil. Individuals with intensive care unit stays > 72 hours (emergency admissions) or > 120 hours (elective admissions) attending the post-intensive care unit clinic four months after intensive care unit discharge were consecutively enrolled. The association between the 6-Minute Walk Test distance at baseline and physical functional status was assessed over 8 months using the Barthel Index.

resultsThe mean 6-Minute Walk Test distance was significantly lower in intensive care unit survivors than in the general population (405m versus 557m; p < 0.001). Age (β = -4.0; p < 0.001) and muscle weakness (β = -99.7; p = 0.02) were associated with the 6-Minute Walk Test distance. A 6-Minute Walk Test distance was associated with improvement in physical functional status over the 8-month follow-up (odds ratio for each 10m of 1.07; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.16; p = 0.03). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for the 6-Minute Walk Test prediction of physical functional status improvement was 0.72 (95%CI 0.53 - 0.88).

conclusionThe 6-Minute Walk Test performed 4 months after intensive care unit discharge predicted long-term physical functional status among intensive care unit survivors with moderate accuracy.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsSurvivorsHumansPatient DischargeProspective StudiesWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID35107548
PMCPMC8555392
OpenAlexW4210289232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.