Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107512›Full record

SynthesisCoDAS2022

Effects of low-level laser photobiomodulation on the masticatory function and mandibular movements in adults with temporomandibular disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Camila Fonsêca Guedes Pereira Máximo, Julyane Feitoza Coêlho, Silvia Damasceno Benevides, Giorvan Ânderson Dos Santos Alves

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CoDAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camila Fonsêca Guedes Pereira MáximoPrograma Associado de Pós-graduação em Fonoaudiologia - PPgFon UFPB/UFRN, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5279-7179
Julyane Feitoza CoêlhoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Linguística, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2653
Silvia Damasceno BenevidesDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4877-0835
Giorvan Ânderson Dos Santos AlvesDepartamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba - UFPB - João Pessoa (PB), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-0139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the effects of low-level laser photobiomodulation on masticatory function and mandibular movements in adults with temporomandibular disorder. RESEARCH STRATEGIES: Search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, using the following descriptors: "temporomandibular joint disorders", "low-level light therapy", "low-level laser therapy", "mastication", and "mandible". SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials in adults with temporomandibular disorder, using low-level laser and assessing the mastication and mandibular movements. DATA ANALYSIS: Firstly, the titles and abstracts of all retrieved studies were read. Then, only the studies selected in the first stage were read in full and assessed regarding eligibility. After the selection, the characteristics, methodological quality, and quality of evidence of the studies included in the review were analyzed. In the meta-analysis, the mean amplitude of mouth opening was considered as a measure of intervention effect.

resultsThe 10 articles included in the review had quite different results one from the other, especially regarding the amplitude of mouth opening, while the mastication was assessed in only one of them. Most studies had a high risk of bias, demonstrating a low methodological quality. Significantly higher results for photobiomodulation were identified in the six studies included in the meta-analysis.

conclusionDue to the scarcity in the literature, there is not enough evidence of the effects of low-level laser photobiomodulation on mastication. As for the mandibular movements, this intervention presented significant results, particularly in the amplitude of mouth opening.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAdultHumansLasersMandibleMastication

Identifiers

PMID35107512
PMCPMC9769431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.