Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107427›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Implementation of an mHealth App to Promote Engagement During HIV Care and Viral Load Suppression in Johannesburg, South Africa (iThemba Life): Pilot Technical Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Samanta Tresha Lalla-Edward, Nonkululeko Mashabane, Lynsey Stewart-Isherwood, Lesley Scott, Kyle Fyvie, Dana Duncan, Betiel Haile, Kamal Chugh, Yiyong Zhou, Jacob Reimers and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Samanta Tresha Lalla-EdwardEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-1643
Nonkululeko MashabaneEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5648-8090
Lynsey Stewart-IsherwoodMolecular Medicine & Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-5515
Lesley ScottMolecular Medicine & Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6573-9525
Kyle FyvieMolecular Medicine & Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-4151
Dana DuncanRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-5626
Betiel HaileRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-1050
Kamal ChughRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7886-0284
Yiyong ZhouRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2532-440X
Jacob ReimersRoche Molecular Systems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9797-1361
Matteus PanRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-1907
Maya VenkatramanRoche Molecular Systems, Inc, Pleasanton, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-3102
Wendy StevensMolecular Medicine & Haematology, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1684-908X
Materials Systems (United States) · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZARoche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa has the largest HIV treatment program worldwide. Retention in care and medication adherence remain problematic necessitating innovative solutions for improving HIV care. The increasing availability and use of mobile technology can support positive clinical outcomes for persons living with HIV. iThemba Life is a mobile health app designed with input from South African health professionals and patients, promoting engagement with HIV care through access to medical results.

objectiveThis study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of receiving HIV viral load (VL) results through the app and compare the time to HIV VL result return for study participants before and after app use.

methodsUsing convenience sampling, adults having routine VL phlebotomy were recruited from 2 Johannesburg health facilities. After signed consent, the app was downloaded on their Android smartphones, phlebotomy was performed, and the sample barcode was scanned through their phone to link the sample and app. Participants received a notification of the result availability and logged into the app to view results, their explanation and recommended action.

resultsOverall, 750 people were screened to enroll 500 participants. Of 750, 113 (15.1%) failed eligibility screening. 21.5% (137/637) had smartphone technical limitations preventing enrollment. Results were released to 92.2% (461/500) of participants' phones. App technical issues and laboratory operational issues limited the number of released results. Approximately 78.1% (360/461) results were viewed in the app. Median time from notification of availability to result viewed being 15.5 hours (0.6; range 0-150 days). Turnaround time from phlebotomy to the result being received was 6 (range 1-167) days for users versus 56 days (range 10-430 days; P<.001) before app use. Overall, 4% (20/500) of participants received unsuppressed results (VL>1000 copies/mL). Turnaround time for unsuppressed results was 7 days for participants versus 37.5 days before app use (P<.001). The difference before and after app use in the suppressed and unsuppressed users for time from sample collection to result delivery was statistically significant. Of 20 participants, 12 (60%) returned for a confirmatory VL during the study period. The time from an unsuppressed VL to a confirmatory VL was 106 days for app users versus 203 days before app use (P<.001). Overall, 52.4% (262/500) of participants completed an exit survey; 23.2% (58/250) reported challenges in viewing their VL results. Moreover, 58% (35/60) reported that they overcame challenges with technical assistance from others, and 97.3% (255/262) wanted to continue using the app for VL results.

conclusionsUsing iThemba Life for VL results was well-received despite limited smartphone access for some participants. App users received results 10 times sooner than before the app and 5 times sooner if their VL >1000 copies/mL. This increased notification speed led to participants wanting to continue using iThemba Life.

Indexed as

digital healthdisease managementHIVmHealthmobile phonepatient-centricSouth Africavirological suppression

Identifiers

PMID35107427
PMCPMC8851337
OpenAlexW3215947858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.