Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35107422›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Lessons Learned Recruiting and Retaining Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals in Digital Trials: Viewpoint.

Amanda M Parks, Jennifer Duffecy, Jennifer E McCabe, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Jeannette Milgrom, Yafit Hirshler, Alan W Gemmill, Lisa S Segre, Jennifer N Felder, Lori Uscher-Pines

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A Whole New World: Overcoming Methodological Challenges in the Post-Pandemic Recruitment of Pregnant Women at Risk of STIs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda M ParksDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6835-9608
Jennifer DuffecyDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-6820
Jennifer E McCabeDepartment of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3288-8759
Rachel Blankstein BremanSchool of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3881-6833
Jeannette MilgromParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-4595
Yafit HirshlerParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-736X
Alan W GemmillParent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7753-4110
Lisa S SegreCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9788-9579
Jennifer N FelderOsher Center for Integrative Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4598-7836
Lori Uscher-PinesRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8816-0986
The University of Melbourne · AURAND Corporation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USWestern Washington University · US

Funding

The Impact of Virtual Doula Services on Birth Outcomes in Rural CommunitiesR01NR018837 · NINR · RAND CORPORATION · PI Lori Uscher-Pines · 2020 to 2026
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an increasingly connected world and in the midst of a global pandemic, digital trials offer numerous advantages over traditional trials that rely on physical study sites. Digital trials have the potential to improve access to research and clinical treatments for the most vulnerable and minoritized, including pregnant and postpartum individuals. However, digital trials are underutilized in maternal and child health research, and there is limited evidence to inform the design and conduct of digital trials. Our research collaborative, consisting of 5 research teams in the U.S. and Australia, aimed to address this gap. We collaborated to share lessons learned from our experiences recruiting and retaining pregnant and postpartum individuals in digital trials of social and behavioral interventions. We first discuss the promise of digital trials in improving participation in research during the perinatal period, as well as the unique challenges they pose. Second, we present lessons learned from 12 completed and ongoing digital trials that have used platforms such as Ovia, Facebook, and Instagram for recruitment. Our trials evaluated interventions for breastfeeding, prenatal and postpartum depression, insomnia, decision making, and chronic pain. We focus on challenges and lessons learned in 3 key areas: (1) rapid recruitment of large samples with a diversity of minoritized identities, (2) retention of study participants in longitudinal studies, and (3) prevention of fraudulent enrollment. We offer concrete strategies that we pilot-tested to address these challenges. Strategies presented in this commentary can be incorporated, as well as formally evaluated, in future studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19digital healthdigital trialsfraudulent enrollmentmaternal and child healthpandemicparentingpediatricspostpartumpregnant and postpartum individualspregnant womenretention and recruitment

Identifiers

PMID35107422
PMCPMC9037306
OpenAlexW4210748789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.