Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106931›Full record

SynthesisEarly intervention in psychiatry2022

Relative efficacy of psychological interventions following interpersonal trauma on anxiety, depression, substance use, and PTSD symptoms in young people: A meta-analysis.

Wilma Peters, Simon Rice, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Sarah E Hetrick, Emma Halpin, Ilias Kamitsis, Olga Santesteban-Echarri, Sarah Bendall

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wilma PetersDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-0999
Simon RiceDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-8553
Mario Alvarez-JimenezDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah E HetrickDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-0142
Emma HalpinDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ilias KamitsisDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Olga Santesteban-EcharriHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2677-6125
Sarah BendallDepartment of Research and Translation, Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInterpersonal trauma exposures are associated with anxiety, depression, and substance use in youth populations (aged 12-25 years). This meta-analysis reports on the efficacy of psychological interventions on these symptom domains in addition to post-traumatic stress.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a search of electronic databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interventions for young people following interpersonal trauma exposure. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were analysed using random-effects meta-analyses.

resultsOf the 4832 records screened, 78 studies were reviewed, and 10 RCTs, involving 679 participants (mean age 15.6 years), were analysed. There was a large pooled effect size for post-traumatic stress (7 studies, g = 1.43, 95% CI [0.37, 2.15], p = .002) and substance use (2 studies, g = 0.70, 95% CI [-0.11, 1.22], p < .001) and small effect sizes for anxiety (4 studies, g = 0.30, 95% CI [0.10, 0.49], p = .003), and trend-level effect for depression (10 studies, g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.00, 0.54], p = .052). Heterogeneity was significant for post-traumatic stress and moderate for depression.

conclusionsHigh-quality RCTs of psychological interventions for anxiety, depression, substance use, and post-traumatic stress symptoms in young people exposed to interpersonal trauma are scarce. While available studies show either statistically significant or trend-level efficacy for psychological interventions in reducing these symptoms, wide confidence intervals, heterogeneity and small sample size mean that results need to be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAnxietyDepressionHumansPsychosocial InterventionPsychotherapyadolescentdepressionpost-traumaticpsychological interventionyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID35106931
PMCPMC9786735
OpenAlexW4210299376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.