ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2022
Compression automation of circular stapler for preventing compression injury on gastrointestinal anastomosis.
Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of intestinal tissue safety during the compression process of circular end-to-end anastomosis stapler based on finite element simulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Comparative Study of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgeries.Cureus · 2024Article
- Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Biologically inspired gastrointestinal stapler design: "Getting to Zero" complications.American journal of surgery · 2023Review
- Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Compression automation of circular stapler for preventing compression injury on gastrointestinal anastomosis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConventional manual compression relies on the surgeon's subjective sensations, so excessive compression can cause tissue injury to the stapling line of the intestinal anastomosis.
methodsAutomatic compression monitoring and compression control system was developed for circular stapler. The tissue injury related compression variables were evaluated and accommodated by compression control device. The compression injury-reducing performance was verified on collagen sheets of in vitro experiments.
resultsExcessive pressure and tissue deformation were associated with compression-induced tissue damages. The safe pressure range was very narrow in weaker tissue than normal collagen. The automatic system performed proper compression within a safe pressure range without tissue injury.
conclusionsManual compression of circular stapler could cause tissue injuries by excessive pressure and tissue deformation. Our automatic compression system is designed to control peak pressure to prevent the compressive tissue injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.