Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106830›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2022

International Validation of the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score.

Alex Y Doets, Christa Walgaard, Hester F Lingsma, Badrul Islam, Nowshin Papri, Yuko Yamagishi, Susumu Kusunoki, Mazen M Dimachkie, Waqar Waheed, Noah Kolb and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Guillain-Barré syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Article
  8. Guillain-Barré syndrome: a comprehensive review.European journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alex Y DoetsDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-2527
Christa WalgaardDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Badrul IslamLaboratory of Gut-Brain Signaling, Laboratory Sciences and Services Division, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nowshin PapriDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Yuko YamagishiDepartment of Neurology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Susumu KusunokiDepartment of Neurology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Mazen M DimachkieDepartment of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Waqar WaheedDepartment of Neurology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Noah KolbDepartment of Neurology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Kenneth C GorsonDepartment of Neurology, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University, School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Bart C JacobsDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
IGOS Consortium

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P008399/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to validate the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score in the International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study cohort, and to improve its performance and region-specificity.

methodsWe examined data from the first 1,500 included patients, aged ≥6 years and not ventilated prior to study entry. Patients with a clinical variant or mild symptoms were also included. Outcome was mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Model performance was assessed regarding the discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and the calibration (observed vs predicted probability of mechanical ventilation), in the full cohort and in Europe/North America and Asia separately. We recalibrated the model to improve its performance and region-specificity.

resultsIn the group of 1,023 eligible patients (Europe/North America n = 842, Asia n = 104, other n = 77), 104 (10%) required mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Area under the curve values were ≥0.80 for all validation subgroups. Mean observed proportions of mechanical ventilation were lower than predicted risks: full cohort 10% versus 21%, Europe/North America 9% versus 21%, and Asia 17% versus 23%. After recalibration, predicted risks for the full cohort and Europe/North America corresponded to observed proportions.

interpretationThis prospective, international cohort study validated the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score, and showed that the model can be used in the full spectrum of Guillain-Barré syndrome patients. In addition, a more accurate, region-specific version of the model was developed for patients from Europe/North America. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:521-531.

Indexed as

Guillain-Barre SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID35106830
PMCPMC9306880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.