ArticleAnnals of neurology2022
International Validation of the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Adults with Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Neurocritical care · 2023Guideline
- The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Neurofilament light chain improves clinical prognostic models for Guillain-Barré syndrome.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Prevalence and Patterns of Cranial Nerve Involvement in CIDP, Autoimmune Nodopathy, MMN, and Anti-MAG Neuropathy: A Multicenter Korea/UK Study of 582 Patients.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Critical insights for intensivists on Guillain-Barré syndrome.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Article
- Guillain-Barré syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Article
- Guillain-Barré syndrome: a comprehensive review.European journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Article
- Predictors of respiratory failure in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a 22 year cohort study from a single Italian centre.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Clinical features and maternal and fetal outcomes in women with Guillain-Barré syndrome in pregnancy.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Early electrophysiological study variants and their relationship with clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: how is it different? a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2023Article
- The Peculiarity of Infection and Immunity Correlated with Guillain-Barré Syndrome in the HIV-Infected Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Exploring Extubation Readiness in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to validate the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score in the International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study cohort, and to improve its performance and region-specificity.
methodsWe examined data from the first 1,500 included patients, aged ≥6 years and not ventilated prior to study entry. Patients with a clinical variant or mild symptoms were also included. Outcome was mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Model performance was assessed regarding the discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and the calibration (observed vs predicted probability of mechanical ventilation), in the full cohort and in Europe/North America and Asia separately. We recalibrated the model to improve its performance and region-specificity.
resultsIn the group of 1,023 eligible patients (Europe/North America n = 842, Asia n = 104, other n = 77), 104 (10%) required mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Area under the curve values were ≥0.80 for all validation subgroups. Mean observed proportions of mechanical ventilation were lower than predicted risks: full cohort 10% versus 21%, Europe/North America 9% versus 21%, and Asia 17% versus 23%. After recalibration, predicted risks for the full cohort and Europe/North America corresponded to observed proportions.
interpretationThis prospective, international cohort study validated the Erasmus Guillain-Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score, and showed that the model can be used in the full spectrum of Guillain-Barré syndrome patients. In addition, a more accurate, region-specific version of the model was developed for patients from Europe/North America. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:521-531.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.