Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106809›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Can nebulised HepArin Reduce morTality and time to Extubation in patients with COVID-19 Requiring invasive ventilation Meta-Trial (CHARTER-MT): Protocol and statistical analysis plan for an investigator-initiated international meta-trial of prospective randomised clinical studies.

Frank M P van Haren, John G Laffey, Antonio Artigas, Clive Page, Marcus J Schultz, David Cosgrave, Bairbre McNicholas, Thomas L Smoot, Quentin Nunes, Alice Richardson and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nebulized Heparin to Reduce COVID-19-induced Acute Lung Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Frank M P van HarenAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8037-4229
John G LaffeyAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, and Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI) at CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-9573
Antonio ArtigasCritical Center, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Clive PageSackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, King's College London, UK.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David CosgraveDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Ireland.
Bairbre McNicholasDepartment of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Ireland.
Thomas L SmootFrederick Memorial Hospital, Frederick, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6188-2217
Quentin NunesInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alice RichardsonAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Hwan-Jin YoonAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Lex M van LoonAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Angajendra GhoshIntensive Care Unit, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Simone SaidIntensive Care Unit, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Rakshit PanwarJohn Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Roger SmithDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
John D SantamariaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Barry DixonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
CHARTER Collaborative Research Group
Australian National University · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUNorthern Hospital · AUUniversity Hospital Galway · IECalvert Memorial Hospital · USJohn Hunter Hospital · AUKing's College London · GBMahidol University · THScience Foundation Ireland · IEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant interest in the potential for nebulised unfractionated heparin (UFH), as a novel therapy for patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure requiring invasive ventilation. The scientific and biological rationale for nebulised heparin stems from the evidence for extensive activation of coagulation resulting in pulmonary microvascular thrombosis in COVID-19 pneumonia. Nebulised delivery of heparin to the lung may limit alveolar fibrin deposition and thereby limit progression of lung injury. Importantly, laboratory studies show that heparin can directly inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus, thereby prevent its entry into and infection of mammalian cells. UFH has additional anti-inflammatory and mucolytic properties that may be useful in this context. METHODS AND

interventionThe Can nebulised HepArin Reduce morTality and time to Extubation in Patients with COVID-19 Requiring invasive ventilation Meta-Trial (CHARTER-MT) is a collaborative prospective individual patient data analysis of on-going randomised controlled clinical trials across several countries in five continents, examining the effects of inhaled heparin in patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive ventilation on various endpoints. Each constituent study will randomise patients with COVID-19 induced respiratory failure requiring invasive ventilation. Patients are randomised to receive nebulised heparin or standard care (open label studies) or placebo (blinded placebo-controlled studies) while under invasive ventilation. Each participating study collect a pre-defined minimum dataset. The primary outcome for the meta-trial is the number of ventilator-free days up to day 28 day, defined as days alive and free from invasive ventilation.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyAirway ExtubationHeparinHumansLungRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeHeparinARDSCOVID-19meta-trialnebulised heparinpandemicrandomised studyRCTrespiratory failureSARSSARS-CoV-2unfractionated heparin

Identifiers

PMID35106809
PMCPMC9303761
OpenAlexW4210366066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.