Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106718›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Telephone Access Management in Primary Care: Cross-Case Analysis of High-Performing Primary Care Access Sites.

Emmeline Chuang, Amy Bonilla, Susan Stockdale, Aditi Das, Elizabeth M Yano, Danielle Rose

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Appointments aren't Access: The Hidden Work of Getting Care.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emmeline ChuangSchool of Social Welfare, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. emchuang@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-3273
Amy BonillaHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Susan StockdaleHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aditi DasSchool of Social Welfare, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elizabeth M YanoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Danielle RoseHSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior · USDepartment of Health Services · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

HSRD VA I50 HX002734HSRD VA IK6 HX002836VA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care telephone access has been associated with patient satisfaction and emergency department utilization even after accounting for objective appointment wait times. However, relatively little is known about how to best structure and manage telephone access in primary care.

objectiveAssess how primary care telephone access is structured and managed and explore how variation in telephone management may affect primary care teams and patients.

designWe used 2016 administrative and patient survey data to select six Veterans Administration medical centers (VAMCs) with above-average primary care access (time to third next available appointment) but variable patient-reported access, geographic region, and urbanicity. Semi-structured interviews were conducted August -October 2017.

participantsForty-three key stakeholders knowledgeable about primary care, telephone management, and operational priorities nationally and/or within each VAMC. KEY

resultsTelephone access was organized and managed differently across sites. Regional call centers were perceived as more efficient but less flexible in tailoring processes to meet local needs. Patient preferences for speaking with their own care teams were cited as a reason to manage telephone access locally rather than regionally, particularly in rural sites. Sites with high patient-rated access described call center functions as well-integrated with primary care team workflow, while those with low patient-rated access perceived telephone management practices as negatively affecting primary care team workload. Call center understaffing was a major barrier to optimal telephone access in all six sites, though rural sites reported greater challenges with provider recruitment and retention.

conclusionsIn VA, efforts to improve telephone access have focused on centralizing call center operations but current call center performance metrics do not account for the extent to which call center functions are integrated with primary care workflows or may impact patient experience. Efforts to improve primary care access should carefully consider impact of telephone management practices on providers and patients.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesTelephoneHumansPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareRural PopulationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairspatient-rated accessprimary carequalitative researchtelephone access

Identifiers

PMID35106718
PMCPMC8806007
OpenAlexW4210787875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.