ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
The role of imaging features and resection status in the survival outcome of sporadic optic pathway glioma children receiving different adjuvant treatments.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Very long-term outcomes of pediatric patients treated for optic pathway gliomas: A longitudinal cohort study.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Pediatric diencephalic tumors: a constellation of entities and management modalities.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Optic Pathway Glioma in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Multidisciplinary Entity, Posing Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management Multidisciplinary Management of Optic Pathway Glioma in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Optic pathway glioma (OPG) is a rare brain tumor affecting children, with no standard treatment strategy. This study described the sporadic OPG survival outcomes after surgical treatment and analyzed the role of imaging features and resection status in children receiving different adjuvant treatments. This retrospective study included 165 OPG patients whose clinical information were obtained from the hospital record system. Tumor volume and residual tumor volume were calculated by delineating the lesion area. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were conducted to analyze the independent prognosis factor. A total of 165 patients were included in this study. Respectively, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 87.58% and 77.87%. Residual tumor size and first adjuvant treatment (AT) after surgery were both associated with PFS. In patients with small-size residual tumors, there was no significant difference in PFS between the AT treatment groups. Moreover, age, exophytic cystic components, leptomeningeal metastases, and AT were associated with OS. In patients with exophytic cystic components and those with leptomeningeal metastases, there was no significant difference in OS. Our results revealed that OPG patients could avoid or defer AT by maximized resection. Age ≤ 2 years was a disadvantageous factor for OS. Patients with exophytic cystic components were more likely to benefit from primary surgery, and CT or RT was not beneficial for these patients. Patients with leptomeningeal metastases had a poor prognosis regardless of the treatment they received. Future prospective clinical studies are needed to develop more effective treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.