Trial reportEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2022
Pivotal trial of a biodegradable stent for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture.
Trial report in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biodegradable Stents for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestion · 2025Pooled it
- SX-ELLA biodegradable stent for benign oesophageal strictures: a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Stents and Emerging Alternatives in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long-Term Efficacy of Repeated Endoscopic Incision Combined with Triamcinolone Injection in Patients with Recurrent Benign Esophageal Stricture.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of materials, applications, and future innovations in biodegradable esophageal stents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Stent-in-stent technique under fluoroscopy for removal of embedded esophageal stent: a retrospective case series.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBenign esophageal strictures (BES) cause dysphagia and decrease patients' quality of life. Although mechanical dilation is the standard of care for BES, in some patients, dysphagia is unrelieved despite repeated procedures. The biodegradable stent was developed to resolve refractory BES, with reported favorable outcomes, but it is unapproved in Japan. Thus, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the biodegradable stent (BDS) for patients with refractory BES for regulatory approval.
methodsThis was a nonrandomized single-arm prospective trial conducted at eight institutions. We included patients with BES after ≥ 5 times of dilation or ≥ one time of radial incision and cutting whose dysphagia score (DS) was 2 or worse and an endoscope could not admit. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose DS improvement of ≤ 1 was maintained at 3 months.
resultsThirty patients (median age: 69 years, male/female: 27:3) were enrolled and treated; BDS placement failed in 1 patient. Fourteen patients maintained their DS improvement until 3 months after placement (proportion of DS improvement at 3 months 46.7% [95% CI: 28.3-65.7]), and the median dysphagia-free survival was 98 days [95% CI: 68-123]. Most adverse events could be managed conservatively; however, a patient with BES after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) developed an esophago-left atrium fistula and died approximately 4 months after stent placement.
conclusionThe BDS was effective for refractory BES and the safety was acceptable. However, the indication for this procedure in patients RECEIVING CRT for esophageal cancer should be carefully considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.