ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022
Modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil combination regimen and capecitabine maintenance in metastatic gastric cancer: toxicity and efficacy results.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A review of the current evidence for maintenance therapy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Anti-PD-1 antibody with or without capecitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line therapy of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.The oncologist · 2025Article
- The FJQR Has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Treatment for HER-2 Negative Gastric Cancer.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2024Article
- Heterogeneous Cellular Response of Primary and Metastatic Human Gastric Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines to Magnoflorine and Its Additive Interaction with Docetaxel.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Apatinib as a Third-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center Single-Arm Cohort Study.Journal of gastric cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle progress has been made, and there is an unmet medical need for treatment of metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). Docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluororacil (DCF) combination is an effective regimen with high rate of toxicity and is not well tolerated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a modified DCF (mDCF) combination regimen and capecitabine maintenance in MGC.
methodData of MGC patients were treated with first-line mDCF regimen (two weekly docetaxel 60 mg/m
resultsForty patients were included. Mean age was 53 ± 11. Thirty-two patients had de novo metastasis. All patients' performance status was ECOG 1 or 2 (32/8). Median number of mDCF cycles given was 9 (min-max: 1-23). Overall response rate was 47.5%. Ten patients (25%) received capecitabine maintenance. Grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 20 patients (50%). Hematologic grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 13 patients (32.5%), and grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 11 patients (27.5%) and in 15 cycles. Nonhematologic grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in 7 patients (17.5%). Median follow-up time was 17.2 months. Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.8 ± 1.9 months (95% CI: 6.89-14.64). Median overall survival was 14.7 ± 1.73 months (95% CI: 11.30-18.10).
conclusionsmDCF protocol was a tolerable chemotherapy regimen for the first-line treatment of MGC with higher ORR and longer TTP compared to standard DCF protocol. Capecitabine maintenance might increase TTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35106659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.