ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2023
Should we screen for intracranial aneurysms in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease?
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guidelines for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
- Polycystic Kidney Disease in Children: The Current Status and the Next Horizon.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025Review
- Matching clinical and genetic data in pediatric patients at risk of developing cystic kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Complexity of Childhood Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Case Study of Three Sisters.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in young adults.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is an overview of the challenges associated with screening for asymptomatic intracranial aneurysms (ICA) in children with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). ADPKD is the most common inherited kidney disease affecting 1 in 1,000 people. ICAs are an extra-kidney manifestation of ADPKD, and while the exact pathophysiology of how they develop is unknown, we know that they more commonly occur in the adult rather than paediatric population. ICAs can be found in up to 9-11.5% of adults with ADPKD, but ICA rupture remains a rare event in adults with an incidence of 0.04 per 100 patient years. ICA size is an important factor in determining the risk of aneurysm rupture and therefore affects the decision on intervention in asymptomatic adults. For some, unruptured aneurysms cause no clinical significance, but those that rupture can be associated with devastating morbidity and mortality. Therefore, if detected, the treatment for unruptured ICAs is usually endovascular coiling, alongside recognising the importance of preventative interventions such as hypertension management. There are, however, no current guidelines for either adult or paediatric patients with ADPKD supporting regular screening for asymptomatic ICAs, although there is a suggestion for individualised practice, for example, with those with a positive family history. The UK clinical guidelines for ADPKD in children make research recommendations due to a lack of published literature, which in itself indicates that ICA rupture is an extremely rare phenomenon in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.