Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106639›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2022

Monitoring multiple myeloma in the peripheral blood based on cell-free DNA and circulating plasma cells.

Elisabeth K M Mack, Sören Hartmann, Petra Ross, Ellen Wollmer, Christoph Mann, Andreas Neubauer, Cornelia Brendel, Jörg Hoffmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth K M MackDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany. elisabeth.mack@staff.uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4061-494X
Sören HartmannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Petra RossDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Ellen WollmerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Christoph MannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Andreas NeubauerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-8760
Cornelia BrendelDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
Jörg HoffmannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, 35032, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany. hoffmanx@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung 06-01Stiftung P.E. Kempkes 6/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of novel, highly effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), classical serologic monitoring appears insufficient for response assessment and prediction of relapse. Moreover, serologic studies in MM are hampered by interference of therapeutic antibodies. The detection of malignant plasma cell clones by next generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) circumvents these difficulties and can be performed in the peripheral blood (pB) by targeting circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating plasma cells (CPCs), thus also avoiding an invasive sampling procedure. Here, we applied NGS of VJ light chain (LC) rearrangements in cfDNA and MFC of magnetically-enriched CD138-positive CPCs (me-MFC) to investigate disease burden in unselected MM patients. Sequencing was successful for 114/130 (87.7%) cfDNA samples and me-MFC results were analyzable for 196/205 (95.6%) samples. MM clones were detectable in 38.9% of samples taken at initial diagnosis or relapse (ID/RD), but only in 11.8% of samples taken during complete remission (CR). Circulating MM plasma cells were present in 83.3% of ID/RD samples and 9.9% of CR samples. Residual disease assessment by NGS or me-MFC in samples taken during very good partial remission or CR was 80% concordant. Notably, 4/4 (NGS) and 5/8 (me-MFC) positive CR samples were from patients with oligo- or non-secretory myeloma. The time to progression was shorter if there was evidence of residual myeloma in the pB. Together, our findings indicate that our two novel analytical approaches accurately indicate the course of MM and may be particularly valuable for monitoring patients with serologically non-trackable disease.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsMultiple MyelomaFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualPlasma CellsCell-Free Nucleic AcidscfDNACirculating plasma cellsMinimal residual diseaseMultiparameter flow cytometryMultiple myelomaNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35106639
PMCPMC8913458
OpenAlexW4210502860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.