Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106617›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2022

Effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

Stefan Hagel, Friedhelm Bach, Thorsten Brenner, Hendrik Bracht, Alexander Brinkmann, Thorsten Annecke, Andreas Hohn, Markus Weigand, Guido Michels, Stefan Kluge and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 103 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Therapeutic drug monitoring of high-dosage intravenous flucloxacillin and mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study using inverse probability weighting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan HagelInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. stefan.hagel@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2999-6131
Friedhelm BachDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hendrik BrachtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Alexander BrinkmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, General Hospital of Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany.
Thorsten AnneckeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas HohnDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Markus WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Guido MichelsDepartment of Acute and Emergency Care, St.-Antonius-Hospital gGmbH, Eschweiler, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Axel NierhausDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dominik JarczakDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christina KönigDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk WeismannMedizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, Internistische Notfall- und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Otto FreyDepartment of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Heidenheim, Heidenheim, Germany.
Dominic WitzkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Carsten MüllerCentre of Pharmacology, Department of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Michael KiehntopfDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sophie NeugebauerCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Thomas LehmannInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, and School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mathias W PletzInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
TARGET Trial Investigators
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEHeidelberg University · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEKliniken Maria Hilf · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DEThe University of Queensland · AUUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EO1502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInsufficient antimicrobial exposure is associated with worse outcomes in sepsis. We evaluated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided antibiotic therapy improves outcomes.

methodsRandomized, multicenter, controlled trial from January 2017 to December 2019. Adult patients (n = 254) with sepsis or septic shock were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam with dosing guided by daily TDM of piperacillin or continuous infusion with a fixed dose (13.5 g/24 h if eGFR ≥ 20 mL/min). Target plasma concentration was four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (range ± 20%) of the underlying pathogen, respectively, of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in empiric situation. Primary outcome was the mean of daily total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score up to day 10.

resultsAmong 249 evaluable patients (66.3 ± 13.7 years; female, 30.9%), there was no significant difference in mean SOFA score between patients with TDM (7.9 points; 95% CI 7.1-8.7) and without TDM (8.2 points; 95% CI 7.5-9.0) (p = 0.39). Patients with TDM-guided therapy showed a lower 28-day mortality (21.6% vs. 25.8%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.44) and a higher rate of clinical (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.5-6.2, p = 0.30) and microbiological cure (OR 2.4; 95% CI 0.7-7.4, p = 0.12), but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Attainment of target concentration was more common in patients with TDM (37.3% vs. 14.6%, OR 4.5, CI 95%, 2.9-6.9, p < 0.001).

conclusionTDM-guided therapy showed no beneficial effect in patients with sepsis and continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam with regard to the mean SOFA score. Larger studies with strategies to ensure optimization of antimicrobial exposure are needed to definitively answer the question.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringSepsisAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMultiple Organ FailurePenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationSepsisTherapeutic drug monitoringβ-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID35106617
PMCPMC8866359
OpenAlexW4210402439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.