Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106605›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2022

Can prior exposure to repeated non-paretic slips improve reactive responses on novel paretic slips among people with chronic stroke?

Shamali Dusane, Tanvi Bhatt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03205527 (Perturbation Training for Enhancing Stability and Limb Support Control for Fall-risk Reduction Among Stroke Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03205527 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Perturbation Training for Enhancing Stability and Limb Support Control for Fall-risk Reduction Among Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2017 to 2027Enrolled91ConditionsStrokeArmsOverground slip perturbation training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimal Reactive Balance Training Characteristics Poststroke: Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shamali DusaneDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Tanvi BhattDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. tbhatt6@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-1018

Funding

Perturbation training for enhancing stability and limb support control for fall-risk reduction among stroke survivorsR01HD088543 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BHATT, TANVI · 2016 to 2022
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088543NIH HHS 1R01HD088543-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined if people with chronic stroke (PwCS) could adapt following non-paretic overground gait-slips and whether such prior exposure to non-paretic slips could improve reactive responses on novel paretic slip. Forty-nine PwCS were randomly assigned to either adaptation group, which received eight unexpected, overground, nonparetic-side gait-slips followed by two paretic-side slips or a control group, which received two paretic-side slips. Slip outcome, recovery strategies, center of mass (CoM) state stability, post-slip stride length and slipping kinematics were analyzed. The adaptation group demonstrated fall-reduction from first to eighth non-paretic slips, along with improved stability, stride length and slipping kinematics (p < 0.05). Within the adaptation group, on comparing novel slips, paretic-side demonstrated comparable pre-slip stability (p > 0.05); however, lower post-slip stability, increased slip velocity and falls was noted (p < 0.05). There was no difference in any variables between the novel paretic slips of adaptation and control group (p > 0.01). However, there was a rapid improvement on the 2nd slip such that adaptation group demonstrated improved performance from the first to second paretic slip compared to that in the control group (p < 0.01). PwCS demonstrated immediate proactive and reactive adaptation with overground, nonparetic-side gait-slips. However, PwCS did not demonstrate any inter-limb performance gain on the paretic-side after prior nonparetic-side adaptation when exposed to a novel paretic-side slip; but they did show significant positive gains with single slip priming on the paretic-side compared to controls without prior adaptation.Clinical registry number: NCT03205527.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceStrokeAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansWalkingAdaptationFall-riskSlip-perturbationStroke

Identifiers

PMID35106605
PMCPMC9290783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.