Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106579›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2022

Considerations and best practices in animal science 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing microbiome studies.

Margaret D Weinroth, Aeriel D Belk, Chris Dean, Noelle Noyes, Dana K Dittoe, Michael J Rothrock, Steven C Ricke, Phillip R Myer, Madison T Henniger, Gustavo A Ramírez and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Progress in the relationship between head and neck squamous cell carcinom and the microbial community].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  8. Marine Peptides fromNutrients · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Margaret D WeinrothU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. National Poultry Research Center (USNPRC), Athens, GA 30605, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8351-395X
Aeriel D BelkDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA.
Chris DeanDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Noelle NoyesDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Dana K DittoeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Michael J RothrockU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. National Poultry Research Center (USNPRC), Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Steven C RickeMeat Science and Animal Biologics Discovery Program, Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Phillip R MyerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1980-2105
Madison T HennigerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Gustavo A RamírezCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8122-4898
Brian B OakleyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766, USA.
Katie Lynn SummersU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Asha M MilesU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Taylor B Ault-SeayDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Zhongtang YuDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-8522
Jessica L MetcalfDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA.
James E WellsUSDA ARS US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome studies in animal science using 16S rRNA gene sequencing have become increasingly common in recent years as sequencing costs continue to fall and bioinformatic tools become more powerful and user-friendly. The combination of molecular biology, microbiology, microbial ecology, computer science, and bioinformatics-in addition to the traditional considerations when conducting an animal science study-makes microbiome studies sometimes intimidating due to the intersection of different fields. The objective of this review is to serve as a jumping-off point for those animal scientists less familiar with 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analyses and to bring up common issues and concerns that arise when planning an animal microbiome study from design through analysis. This review includes an overview of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, its advantages, and its limitations; experimental design considerations such as study design, sample size, sample pooling, and sample locations; wet lab considerations such as field handing, microbial cell lysis, low biomass samples, library preparation, and sequencing controls; and computational considerations such as identification of contamination, accounting for uneven sequencing depth, constructing diversity metrics, assigning taxonomy, differential abundance testing, and, finally, data availability. In addition to general considerations, we highlight some special considerations by species and sample type.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsGenes, rRNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneamplicon sequencingbacteriomebioinformaticsmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID35106579
PMCPMC8807179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.