Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106563›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

A de novo reference assembly of the yellow mangrove Ceriops zippeliana genome.

Wirulda Pootakham, Chutima Sonthirod, Chaiwat Naktang, Wasitthee Kongkachana, Sonicha U-Thoomporn, Phakamas Phetchawang, Chatree Maknual, Darunee Jiumjamrassil, Tamanai Pravinvongvuthi, Sithichoke Tangphatsornruang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reference-based chromosome-scale assembly of Japanese barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) cultivar Hayakiso 2.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  4. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wirulda PootakhamNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-6453
Chutima SonthirodNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Chaiwat NaktangNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-8508
Wasitthee KongkachanaNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-9246
Sonicha U-ThoompornNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Phakamas PhetchawangNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
Chatree MaknualDepartment of Marine and Coastal Resources, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Darunee JiumjamrassilDepartment of Marine and Coastal Resources, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Tamanai PravinvongvuthiDepartment of Marine and Coastal Resources, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Sithichoke TangphatsornruangNational Omics Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2673-0012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mangroves are of great ecological and economical importance, providing shelters for a wide range of species and nursery habitats for commercially important marine species. Ceriops zippeliana (yellow mangrove) belongs to Rhizophoraceae family and is commonly distributed in the tropical and subtropical coastal communities. In this study, we present a high-quality assembly of the C. zippeliana genome. We constructed an initial draft assembly of 240,139,412 bases with an N50 contig length of 564,761 bases using the 10x Genomics linked-read technology. This assembly was further scaffolded with RagTag using a chromosome-scale assembly of a closely related Ceriops species as a reference. The final assembly contained 243,228,612 bases with an N50 scaffold length of 10,559,178 Mb. The size of the final assembly was close to those estimated using DNA flow cytometry (248 Mb) and the k-mer distribution analysis (246 Mb). We predicted a total of 23,474 gene models and 21,724 protein-coding genes in the C. zippeliana genome, of which 16,002 were assigned gene ontology terms. We recovered 97.1% of the highly conserved orthologs based on the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs analysis. The phylogenetic analysis based on single-copy orthologous genes illustrated that C. zippeliana and Ceriops tagal diverged approximately 10.2 million years ago (MYA), and their last common ancestor and Kandelia obovata diverged approximately 29.9 MYA. The high-quality assembly of C. zippeliana presented in this work provides a useful genomic resource for studying mangroves' unique adaptations to stressful intertidal habitats and for developing sustainable mangrove forest restoration and conservation programs.

Indexed as

RhizophoraceaeChromosomesGenomeGenomicsPhylogeny10x GenomicsCeriops zippelianachromosome-scale genome assemblymangroveRagTag

Identifiers

PMID35106563
PMCPMC8982413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.