Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106536›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

A direct test of competitive versus cooperative episodic-procedural network dynamics in human memory.

Michael V Freedberg, Jack A Reeves, Cynthia M Fioriti, Jorge Murillo, Joel L Voss, Eric M Wassermann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael V FreedbergBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3738-8259
Jack A ReevesBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Cynthia M FioritiBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jorge MurilloBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joel L VossDepartment of Neurology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Eric M WassermannBehavioral Neurology Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical lesion studies led to a consensus that episodic and procedural memory arises from segregated networks identified with the hippocampus and the caudate nucleus, respectively. Neuroimaging studies, however, show that competitive and cooperative interactions occur between networks during memory tasks. Furthermore, causal experiments to manipulate connectivity between these networks have not been performed in humans. Although nodes common to both networks, such as the precuneus and ventrolateral thalamus, may mediate their interaction, there is no experimental evidence for this. We tested how network-targeted noninvasive brain stimulation affects episodic-procedural network interactions and how these network manipulations affect episodic and procedural memory in healthy young adults. Compared to control (vertex) stimulation, hippocampal network-targeted stimulation increased within-network functional connectivity and hippocampal connectivity with the caudate. It also increased episodic, relative to procedural, memory, and this persisted one week later. The differential effect on episodic versus procedural memory was associated with increased functional connectivity between the caudate, precuneus, and ventrolateral thalamus. These findings provide direct evidence of episodic-procedural network competition, mediated by regions common to both networks. Enhanced hippocampal network connectivity may boost episodic, but decrease procedural, memory by co-opting resources shared between networks.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingParietal LobeYoung Adultcaudateepisodic memoryhippocampusprocedural memoryrTMS

Identifiers

PMID35106536
PMCPMC9627141
OpenAlexW4210515605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.