ReviewCell reports. Medicine2022
The inclusion of augmented intelligence in medicine: A framework for successful implementation.
Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence in predicting in-hospital cardiac and respiratory arrest in an acute care environment-implications for clinical practice.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Artificial intelligence in clinical trials-state of the evidence, gaps, and next steps.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Implications of the new US AI framework in medicine.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- AI Adoption in US Cancer Centers: National Cross-Sectional Study of Institutional and Policy Determinants.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evidence, use cases, and implementation safeguards of large language models in primary care.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in MRI for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical AI Incorporating Validation Strategies, Real-World Applicability, and Ethical Principles: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Identifying and mitigating bias in multiple aspects of modern clinical research.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Detecting and Mitigating Bias for Inclusive and Trustworthy Clinical Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence electrocardiography for left ventricular systolic dysfunction demonstrates preserved performance across demographic training imbalances.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Adaptive yet suboptimal integration of advice in decision-making.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Total product lifecycle regulatory considerations and recommendations for generative AI-enabled medical devices.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Treatment Response Phenotyping Informed by Patient Physiologic Characteristics Could Drive Precision Critical Care Through Augmented Intelligence: A Narrative Review.CHEST critical care · 2026Article
- Do world-wide policy initiatives for regulating health care related artificial intelligence safeguard the declaration of Helsinki?EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- The application and challenges of ChatGPT in laboratory medicine.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- The electrocardiogram reimagined: AI-ECG as a prognostic beacon for valvular heart disease.European heart journal · 2025Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are being applied across a large spectrum of everyday life activities. The implementation of AI algorithms in clinical practice has been met with some skepticism and concern, mainly because of the uneasiness that stems, in part, from a lack of understanding of how AI operates, together with the role of physicians and patients in the decision-making process; uncertainties regarding the reliability of the data and the outcomes; as well as concerns regarding the transparency, accountability, liability, handling of personal data, and monitoring and system upgrades. In this viewpoint, we take these issues into consideration and offer an integrated regulatory framework to AI developers, clinicians, researchers, and regulators, aiming to facilitate the adoption of AI that rests within the FDA's pathway, in research, development, and clinical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.