Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106487›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in food science2022

Trust your gut: Bioavailability and bioaccessibility of dietary compounds.

Daniele Bobrowski Rodrigues, Marcella Camargo Marques, Adriele Hacke, Paulo Sérgio Loubet Filho, Cinthia Baú Betim Cazarin, Lilian Regina Barros Mariutti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniele Bobrowski RodriguesDepartment of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.
Marcella Camargo MarquesDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Food Nutrition, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriele HackeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Food Nutrition, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Sérgio Loubet FilhoDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Food Nutrition, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cinthia Baú Betim CazarinDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Food Nutrition, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lilian Regina Barros MariuttiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Food Nutrition, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the composition of a certain food is not enough to predict its health benefits. Research over the past decades has decisively strengthened the notion that any putative health benefit is best related to the fraction of compounds transferred from ingested foods into the body since the absorption may be incomplete after oral consumption. In other words, the bioavailability of food components is crucial information. Therefore, a variety of

Indexed as

Intestinal cell modelsIn vitro digestionMicrophysiological systemsNutrient absorptionNutrient distributionTransepithelial transport

Identifiers

PMID35106487
PMCPMC8787780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.