Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106378›Full record

ArticleACS central science2022

Routescore: Punching the Ticket to More Efficient Materials Development.

Martin Seifrid, Riley J Hickman, Andrés Aguilar-Granda, Cyrille Lavigne, Jenya Vestfrid, Tony C Wu, Théophile Gaudin, Emily J Hopkins, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin SeifridDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-0058
Riley J HickmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Andrés Aguilar-GrandaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Cyrille LavigneDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-1866
Jenya VestfridDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Tony C WuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Théophile GaudinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Emily J HopkinsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
Alán Aspuru-GuzikDepartment of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-4434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-driving laboratories, in the form of automated experimentation platforms guided by machine learning algorithms, have emerged as a potential solution to the need for accelerated science. While new tools for automated analysis and characterization are being developed at a steady rate, automated synthesis remains the bottleneck in the chemical space accessible to self-driving laboratories. Combining automated and manual synthesis efforts immediately significantly expands the explorable chemical space. To effectively direct the different capabilities of automated (higher throughput and less labor) and manual synthesis (greater chemical versatility), we describe a protocol, the RouteScore, that quantifies the cost of combined synthetic routes. In this work, the RouteScore is used to determine the most efficient synthetic route to a well-known pharmaceutical (structure-oriented optimization) and to simulate a self-driving laboratory that finds the most easily synthesizable organic laser molecule with specific photophysical properties from a space of ∼3500 possible molecules (property-oriented optimization). These two examples demonstrate the power and flexibility of our approach in mixed synthetic planning and optimization and especially in downselecting promising candidates from a large chemical space via an

Identifiers

PMID35106378
PMCPMC8796309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.