ArticleACS central science2022
Mega-High-Throughput Screening Platform for the Discovery of Biologically Relevant Sequence-Defined Non-Natural Polymers.
Article in ACS central science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seeking Precise Protein-like Functions from Random Heteropolymer Ensemble and through Dimensionality Reduction.ACS central science · 2025Review
- Enabling technology for accelerated discovery of supramolecular materials.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Characterization of a Putative Lysin from Enterococcus faecalis Phage IME-EFm1 and Determination of its Protective Efficacy in Mice.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Long-acting intramuscular injections of ELQ-331, an antimalarial agent.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2024Article
- Advances in Ultrahigh Throughput Hit Discovery with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Encoded Libraries.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combinatorial methods enable the synthesis of chemical libraries on scales of millions to billions of compounds, but the ability to efficiently screen and sequence such large libraries has remained a major bottleneck for molecular discovery. We developed a novel technology for screening and sequencing libraries of synthetic molecules of up to a billion compounds in size. This platform utilizes the fiber-optic array scanning technology (FAST) to screen bead-based libraries of synthetic compounds at a rate of 5 million compounds per minute (∼83 000 Hz). This ultra-high-throughput screening platform has been used to screen libraries of synthetic "self-readable" non-natural polymers that can be sequenced at the femtomole scale by chemical fragmentation and high-resolution mass spectrometry. The versatility and throughput of the platform were demonstrated by screening two libraries of non-natural polyamide polymers with sizes of 1.77M and 1B compounds against the protein targets K-Ras, asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGPR), IL-6, IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), and TNFα. Hits with low nanomolar binding affinities were found against all targets, including competitive inhibitors of K-Ras binding to Raf and functionally active uptake ligands for ASGPR facilitating intracellular delivery of a nonglycan ligand.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.