Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106358›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Role of regulatory capacity in the animal and human health systems in driving response to zoonotic disease outbreaks in the the Mekong region.

Barbara McPake, Katherine Gilbert, Sreytouch Vong, Bandeth Ros, Phalmony Has, Anh Tuan Khuong, Pham-Duc Phuc, Quoc Cuong Hoang, Duc Hai Nguyen, Latsamy Siengsounthone and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scaling up One Health: A network analysis in Lao PDR.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Katherine GilbertNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Sreytouch VongIndependent consultants contracted by the Nossal Institute for Global Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Bandeth RosIndependent consultants contracted by the Nossal Institute for Global Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Phalmony HasNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Anh Tuan KhuongHealth Strategy and Policy Institute, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Pham-Duc PhucCenter for Public Health and Ecosystem Research, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Quoc Cuong HoangPasteur Institute Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Duc Hai NguyenPasteur Institute Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Latsamy SiengsounthoneLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Chanthaly LuangphaxayLao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Peter AnnearNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Justin McKinleyNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a policy situation analysis in three Mekong region countries, focused on how the animal and human health systems interact to control avian influenza (AI). The study used scoping literature reviews aimed at establishing existing knowledge concerning the regulatory context. We then conducted a series of key informant interviews with national and sub-national government officials and representatives of producers and poultry farmers to understand their realities in managing the complex interface of the two sectors to control AI. We found signs of formal progress in establishing the policy and legislative frameworks needed to enable cooperation of the two sectors but a series of constraints that impede their effective operation. These included the competitive relationships involved, especially with budgetary allocations and mandates that can conflict with each other. Many local actors also view development partners (e.g., bilateral and multilateral donors) as having a dominant role in establishing these collaborations, limiting the extent to which there is local ownership of the agenda. The animal and human health sectors are not equally resourced, with the animal health sector disadvantaged in terms of surveillance and laboratory systems, human resources and financial allocations. Contrasting strategies for achieving objectives have also characterised the two sectors in recent decades, seeing a major shift towards the use of incentive-based approaches in the human health sector but very little parallel development in the animal health sector, largely dependent on command and control approaches. Successful future collaborations between the two sectors are likely to depend on better resourcing in the animal health sector, increasing local ownership of the agenda, and ensuring that both sectors can use the full range of regulatory strategies available to achieve objectives.

Indexed as

Animal healthAvian influenzaHuman healthMekongOne health

Identifiers

PMID35106358
PMCPMC8784321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.