Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106320›Full record

ReviewNeurophotonics2022

Contractile apparatus in CNS capillary pericytes.

Şefik E Erdener, Gülce Küreli, Turgay Dalkara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurophotonics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Eppur si muove: the dynamic brain pericyte.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Capillary regression leads to sustained local hypoperfusion by inducing constriction of upstream transitional vessels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Şefik E ErdenerHacettepe University, Institute of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5141-7899
Gülce KüreliHacettepe University, Institute of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Ankara, Turkey.
Turgay DalkaraHacettepe University, Institute of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-7819
Hacettepe University · TRInstitute of Neurological Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

actinblood flowcapillarycentral nervous systemcontractilitypericyte

Identifiers

PMID35106320
PMCPMC8785978
OpenAlexW4206957222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.