Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106312›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Multicenter, Prospective Validation of a Phenotypic Algorithm to Guide Carbapenemase Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant

Christian M Gill, Elif Aktaþ, Wadha Alfouzan, Lori Bourassa, Adrian Brink, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Rafael Canton, Yehuda Carmeli, Marco Falcone, Carlos Kiffer and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Metallo-β-lactamase-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antibiotic susceptibility ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 18 institutions in 12 countries.

Christian M GillCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Elif AktaþUniversity of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Istanbul, Turkey.
Wadha AlfouzanLaboratory Medicine, Farwania Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Lori BourassaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Adrian BrinkDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, National Health Laboratory Services, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Carey-Ann D BurnhamWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Rafael CantonServicio de Microbiologia. Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Yehuda CarmeliNational Institute for Infection Control and Antibiotic Resistance, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Marco FalconeInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-8796
Carlos KifferInternal Medicine Department and LEMC-Alerta Lab, Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-0693
Anna MarcheseDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, and Clinical Microbiology Unit, San Martino Policlinico Hospital-IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Octavio MartinezDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Spyros PournarasLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Michael J SatlinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Harald SeifertInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Abrar K ThabitPharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Kenneth S ThomsonUniversity of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Maria Virginia VillegasGrupo de Resistencia Antimicrobiana y Epidemiología Hospitalaria (RAEH), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research & Development Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Hartford Hospital · USCornell University · USFarwaniya Hospital · KWInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESKing Abdulaziz University · SANational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNational Health Laboratory Service · ZASağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenemase-producing, carbapenem-resistant

methodsCRPA isolates were collected during the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials for

resultsA total of 807 CRPA were assessed, and 464 isolates met the algorithm criteria described above. Overall, testing was reduced by 43% compared with testing all CRPA. Carbapenemase-positive isolates missed by the algorithm were largely driven by Guiana extended spectrum (GES). Addition of the criterion of imipenem- or meropenem-resistant plus ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible decreased the number of CP-CRPA missed by the algorithm (21 vs 40 isolates, respectively), reducing number of isolates tested by 39%.

conclusionsApplication of the initial algorithm (imipenem- or meropenem-resistant plus ceftazidime-nonsusceptible plus cefepime-nonsusceptible) performed well in a global cohort, with 33% phenotypically carbapenemase-positive isolates. The addition of imipenem- or meropenem-resistant plus ceftolozane/tazobactam-nonsusceptible reduced the number of phenotypically carbapenemase-positive isolates missed and may be useful in areas with a prominence of GES.

Indexed as

algorithmcarbapenemasegenotypicmolecular diagnosticsPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35106312
PMCPMC8801223
OpenAlexW4200319621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.