ArticleCureus2022
An Analysis of the Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Single Institutional Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing the effectiveness of prophylactic strategies for parastomal hernia prevention: a network meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Propensity Score Analysis of the Utility of Supervised Perioperative Abdominal Wall Exercises for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study the frequency of risk factors affecting the development of parastomal hernias in patients undergoing stoma formation. STUDY
designA retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study. Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery between January 2017 to December 2020. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 patients aged between 20 and 100 years and who required a stoma formation were included in the study. The patients with incomplete data and those lacking post-operative imaging were excluded. According to this selection criteria, 80 patients were excluded. The data was collected for all patients from the hospital database. This included patient's demographic information, co-morbidities, pre-surgery patient characteristics, an indication of stoma formation, the location of stoma exit, type of surgery, associated comorbidities, subcutaneous fat thickness, and type of stoma formed. Data were analyzed using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
resultsThe mean age was 68.46 ± 16.50 years, with males in the majority: 48 (57.8%). Most of the patients, 53 (63.8%), had malignant disease. Post-stoma formation, a total of 38 (45.9%) patients developed parastomal hernias, mostly involving the sigmoid colon (n=62, 74.7%). However, there was a statistically significant relationship between paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) incidence with non-trans-rectus stomas (trans-oblique n=07, junctional n=28) (OR 3.04, CI 1.23-7.5, p=0.014). Furthermore, malignancy was also not an independent predictor of PSH (OR 0.408, CI 0.15-1.2, p=0.056). All other risk factors included in this study were nonsignificant.
conclusionOur study shows that the incidence of parastomal hernias is rising with a high rate demonstrated in our patients. There was no statistically significant association between patient-related preoperative and operative factors with increased risk of parastomal hernias in our population except for a non-trans-rectus stoma, which was identified as an independent risk factor for parastomal hernias. Based on our findings, we would recommend a trans-rectus stoma over all other stoma sites. However, a much larger study is needed to validate this finding further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.