Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106245›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Comparison of High-Statin Therapy vs Moderate-Statin Therapy in Achieving Positive Low-Density Lipoprotein Change in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized-Control Trial.

Chamithra D Rupasinghe, Theodosios Kantas, Rohail Sani, Natalia M Avendaño Capriles, Ramil Dadabhoy, Afreenish Gul, Camilo Andrés Avendaño Capriles, Noman Khurshid Ahmed, Sohaib Tousif

RetractedOpen access · diamondAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 70% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Chamithra D RupasingheInternal Medicine, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, NPL.
Theodosios KantasDepartment of Surgery, General Athens Hospital, Athens, GRC.
Rohail SaniMedicine, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, PAK.
Natalia M Avendaño CaprilesMedicine, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, COL.
Ramil DadabhoyMedical College, Ziauddin University, Karachi, PAK.
Afreenish GulInternal Medicine, Ziauddin University, Karachi, PAK.
Camilo Andrés Avendaño CaprilesFoundations of Clinical Research (FCR) Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Noman Khurshid AhmedInternal Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Sohaib TousifMedicine, Ziauddin University, Karachi, PAK.
401 General Military Hospital of Athens · GRShifa International Hospital · PKUniversidad del Norte · COAga Khan University Hospital · PKManipal College of Medical Sciences · NPNational Foundation for Cancer Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStatin use in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can play an important role in enhancing clinical outcomes, this has been proven in several randomized trials. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of moderate-intensity and high-intensity statins in controlling low-density lipoprotein (LDL) after ACS. METHODOLOGY: A randomized control trial was conducted at the Cardiology Department of Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2020 to September 2021. During admission, patients were either started on a high-intensity statin dose (rosuvastatin 20 mg) or moderate-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 10 mg) by a computer-generated allocation sequence. Patients were followed-up in the outpatient department (OPD) after 3 months, and a lipid profile at follow-up was obtained. The percentage of LDL change was determined on 3 months of follow-up.

resultsA total of 590 patients were enrolled in the study. Out of all participants enrolled, 334 (80.48%) completed the 3-month follow-up. The mean age of participants was 58.08 (+12.06) years. High-intensity statin therapy is positively associated with positive LDL change (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=4.45, P-value=0.001).

conclusionOur data implies that high-intensity statin medication may be an initial therapeutic option to decrease LDL. However, future randomized clinical trials should corroborate these findings.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecardiachigh-statin therapyldlmoderate-statin therapy

Identifiers

PMID35106245
PMCPMC8788888
OpenAlexW4200472306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.