ArticleClinical case reports2022
Extraction and replantation of a periapically infected tooth.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Extraction and replantation of a periapically infected tooth.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At times, an infected tooth that may be deemed unrestorable may be salvaged by atraumatic removal, an in-hand apicoectomy and retrograde seal, then replantation. This patient was referred to this author for an extraction and implant treatment of the maxillary left second premolar. After a discussion, the patient preferred to salvage the tooth if possible. The tooth was successfully atraumatically removed, and an in-hand apicoectomy and retrograde amalgam seal was placed. The tooth was immediately replaced into its socket and was stable. The occlusal surface was flattened to prevent and off axial loading. A bis-acryl brace was applied to the facial and lingual aspect to prevent an overload while the tooth was healing. The patient was admonished to maintain a soft diet. After 3 weeks, the braces were removed, and the tooth was found to be stable. After 8 weeks, the tooth was asymptomatic, and the patient was able to revert to her normal diet without pain. While extraction, placing an apical seal and replantation of teeth is not a new modality; nonetheless, clinicians may need to be reminded of this procedure to increase the number of options presented to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.