Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106162›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2022

Extraction and replantation of a periapically infected tooth.

Dennis Flanagan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dennis FlanaganLugano University of Switzerland Lugano Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-2764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At times, an infected tooth that may be deemed unrestorable may be salvaged by atraumatic removal, an in-hand apicoectomy and retrograde seal, then replantation. This patient was referred to this author for an extraction and implant treatment of the maxillary left second premolar. After a discussion, the patient preferred to salvage the tooth if possible. The tooth was successfully atraumatically removed, and an in-hand apicoectomy and retrograde amalgam seal was placed. The tooth was immediately replaced into its socket and was stable. The occlusal surface was flattened to prevent and off axial loading. A bis-acryl brace was applied to the facial and lingual aspect to prevent an overload while the tooth was healing. The patient was admonished to maintain a soft diet. After 3 weeks, the braces were removed, and the tooth was found to be stable. After 8 weeks, the tooth was asymptomatic, and the patient was able to revert to her normal diet without pain. While extraction, placing an apical seal and replantation of teeth is not a new modality; nonetheless, clinicians may need to be reminded of this procedure to increase the number of options presented to patients.

Indexed as

apicoectomydebridedental abscessreplantation

Identifiers

PMID35106162
PMCPMC8787722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.