Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35106129›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2022

Waiting for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities.

Björn Knutsson, Mats Jong, Arkan Sayed-Noor, Göran Sjödén, Marika Augutis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Björn KnutssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Science, Umeå University.
Mats JongDepartment of Health Sciences/Public Health, Mid Sweden University.
Arkan Sayed-NoorDepartment of clinical science and education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm.
Göran SjödénDepartment of clinical science and education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm.
Marika AugutisDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society. Division Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Karolinska Institutet · SEMid Sweden University · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to describe aspects of suffering related to being a person with LSS and how suffering is managed before LSS surgery. METHODS/DESIGN/

settingA Swedish county hospital. Interviews with 18 consecutive patients on the waiting list for LSS surgery. The themes that emerged from content analysis were further interpreted using Antonovsky salutogenic model as a sensitizing concept.

resultsThe suffering from LSS before surgery included the main theme of experiencing an impaired physical and social life and struggling to be believed and taken seriously. This had coping strategies to manage symptoms before surgery: a good physician-patient relationship alleviates the burden of long waiting times; ways to manage pain and disability; ambiguous expectations and hope for recovery, and; ways to handle concerns before surgery).

conclusionBeing a person with LSS includes suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities or having support structures for doing so. Our study emphasizes the importance of a supportive dialogue, where physicians and patients make the suffering from LSS and care before LSS surgery more comprehensible and manageable.

Indexed as

copingpatient-physician relationshippatients’ experience of carespinal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID35106129
PMCPMC8801728
OpenAlexW4200525341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.