ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
Convergent clonal selection of donor- and recipient-derived CMV-specific T cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Potential of TCR sequencing in graft-versus-host disease.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Competition between antigen-specific T cells for peptide:MHC complexes shapes the ensuing T cell response. Mouse model studies provided compelling evidence that competition is a highly effective mechanism controlling the activation of naïve T cells. However, assessing the effect of T cell competition in the context of a human infection requires defined pathogen kinetics and trackable naïve and memory T cell populations of defined specificity. A unique cohort of nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients allowed us to assess T cell competition in response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, which was documented with detailed virology data. In our cohort, hematopoietic stem cell transplant donors and recipients were CMV seronegative and positive, respectively, thus providing genetically distinct memory and naïve T cell populations. We used single-cell transcriptomics to track donor versus recipient-derived T cell clones over the course of 90 d. We found that donor-derived T cell clones proliferated and expanded substantially following CMV reactivation. However, for immunodominant CMV epitopes, recipient-derived memory T cells remained the overall dominant population. This dominance was maintained despite more robust clonal expansion of donor-derived T cells in response to CMV reactivation. Interestingly, the donor-derived T cells that were recruited into these immunodominant memory populations shared strikingly similar TCR properties with the recipient-derived memory T cells. This selective recruitment of identical and nearly identical clones from the naïve into the immunodominant memory T cell pool suggests that competition is in place but does not interfere with rejuvenating a memory T cell population. Instead, it results in selection of convergent clones to the memory T cell pool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.