Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105804›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Top-down and bottom-up cohesiveness in microbial community coalescence.

Juan Diaz-Colunga, Nanxi Lu, Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga, Chang-Yu Chang, Helen S Cai, Joshua E Goldford, Mikhail Tikhonov, Álvaro Sánchez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The fungal pathogenISME communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A theory of ecological invasions and its implications for eco-evolutionary dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan Diaz-ColungaDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-4529
Nanxi LuDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Alicia Sanchez-GorostiagaDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-5659
Chang-Yu ChangDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0003-3659-5256
Helen S CaiDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Joshua E GoldfordPhysics of Living Systems, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-8018
Mikhail TikhonovDepartment of Physics, Center for Science & Engineering of Living Systems, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-9558-1121
Álvaro SánchezDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511; alvaro.sanchez@yale.edu.
Yale University · USConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Predicting the assembly and function of microbial consortia: a systems biology approachR35GM133467 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANCHEZ DE ANDRES, ALVARO · 2019 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities frequently invade one another as a whole, a phenomenon known as community coalescence. Despite its potential importance for the assembly, dynamics, and stability of microbial consortia, as well as its prospective utility for microbiome engineering, our understanding of the processes that govern it is still very limited. Theory has suggested that microbial communities may exhibit cohesiveness in the face of invasions emerging from collective metabolic interactions across microbes and their environment. This cohesiveness may lead to correlated invasional outcomes, where the fate of a given taxon is determined by that of other members of its community-a hypothesis known as ecological coselection. Here, we have performed over 100 invasion and coalescence experiments with microbial communities of various origins assembled in two different synthetic environments. We show that the dominant members of the primary communities can recruit their rarer partners during coalescence (top-down coselection) and also be recruited by them (bottom-up coselection). With the aid of a consumer-resource model, we found that the emergence of top-down or bottom-up cohesiveness is modulated by the structure of the underlying cross-feeding networks that sustain the coalesced communities. The model also predicts that these two forms of ecological coselection cannot co-occur under our conditions, and we have experimentally confirmed that one can be strong only when the other is weak. Our results provide direct evidence that collective invasions can be expected to produce ecological coselection as a result of cross-feeding interactions at the community level.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMicrobial Consortiacommunity coalescencecommunity cohesivenesscross-feedingecological coselection

Identifiers

PMID35105804
PMCPMC8832967
OpenAlexW4210799260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.