Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105677›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Adaptive Learning through Temporal Dynamics of State Representation.

Niloufar Razmi, Matthew R Nassar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adaptive learning is structure learning in time.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. The stability flexibility tradeoff and the dark side of detail.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niloufar RazmiRobert J. & Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912-1821.
Matthew R NassarRobert J. & Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912-1821 matthew_nassar@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5397-535X

Funding

Cognitive and Molecular Challenges to Statistical Inference Across Healthy Aging.R00AG054732 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI NASSAR, MATTHEW · 2019 to 2021
$744k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG054732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People adjust their learning rate rationally according to local environmental statistics and calibrate such adjustments based on the broader statistical context. To date, no theory has captured the observed range of adaptive learning behaviors or the complexity of its neural correlates. Here, we attempt to do so using a neural network model that learns to map an internal context representation onto a behavioral response via supervised learning. The network shifts its internal context on receiving supervised signals that are mismatched to its output, thereby changing the "state" to which feedback is associated. A key feature of the model is that such state transitions can either increase learning or decrease learning depending on the duration over which the new state is maintained. Sustained state transitions that occur after changepoints facilitate faster learning and mimic network reset phenomena observed in the brain during rapid learning. In contrast, state transitions after one-off outlier events are short lived, thereby limiting the impact of outlying observations on future behavior. State transitions in our model provide the first mechanistic interpretation for bidirectional learning signals, such as the P300, that relate to learning differentially according to the source of surprising events and may also shed light on discrepant observations regarding the relationship between transient pupil dilations and learning. Together, our results demonstrate that dynamic latent state representations can afford normative inference and provide a coherent framework for understanding neural signatures of adaptive learning across different statistical environments.

Indexed as

BrainNeural Networks, ComputerFeedbackHumansadaptive learningBayesianneural networkP300pupillometryrepresentation

Identifiers

PMID35105677
PMCPMC8944236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.