Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105662›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Neurophysiological Evidence for Cognitive Map Formation during Sequence Learning.

Jennifer Stiso, Christopher W Lynn, Ari E Kahn, Vinitha Rangarajan, Karol P Szymula, Ryan Archer, Andrew Revell, Joel M Stein, Brian Litt, Kathryn A Davis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Trial-by-trial learning of successor representations in human behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-Horizon Associative Learning Explains Human Sensitivity to Statistical and Network Structures in Auditory Sequences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Optimizing the human learnability of abstract network representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer StisoDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Christopher W LynnInitiative for the Theoretical Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016.
Ari E KahnPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Vinitha RangarajanDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Karol P SzymulaDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Ryan ArcherDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Andrew RevellDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Joel M SteinDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Brian LittDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Timothy H LucasDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Dani S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 dsb@seas.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6183-4493
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USPrinceton University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USUniversity of the Sciences · US

Funding

Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Optimized Intracranial EEG Targeting in Focal Epilepsy based upon Neuroimaging ConnectomicsR01NS116504 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Evolution of the Linked Architecture of Network Control and Executive Function in AdolescenceR21MH106799 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2016 to 2017
$515k
Investigating the neurophysiological underpinnings of higher-order statistical learning in humansF31MH120925 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STISO, JENNIFER · 2020 to 2020
$35k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH120925NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106799NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans deftly parse statistics from sequences. Some theories posit that humans learn these statistics by forming cognitive maps, or underlying representations of the latent space which links items in the sequence. Here, an item in the sequence is a node, and the probability of transitioning between two items is an edge. Sequences can then be generated from walks through the latent space, with different spaces giving rise to different sequence statistics. Individual or group differences in sequence learning can be modeled by changing the time scale over which estimates of transition probabilities are built, or in other words, by changing the amount of temporal discounting. Latent space models with temporal discounting bear a resemblance to models of navigation through Euclidean spaces. However, few explicit links have been made between predictions from Euclidean spatial navigation and neural activity during human sequence learning. Here, we use a combination of behavioral modeling and intracranial encephalography (iEEG) recordings to investigate how neural activity might support the formation of space-like cognitive maps through temporal discounting during sequence learning. Specifically, we acquire human reaction times from a sequential reaction time task, to which we fit a model that formulates the amount of temporal discounting as a single free parameter. From the parameter, we calculate each individual's estimate of the latent space. We find that neural activity reflects these estimates mostly in the temporal lobe, including areas involved in spatial navigation. Similar to spatial navigation, we find that low-dimensional representations of neural activity allow for easy separation of important features, such as modules, in the latent space. Lastly, we take advantage of the high temporal resolution of iEEG data to determine the time scale on which latent spaces are learned. We find that learning typically happens within the first 500 trials, and is modulated by the underlying latent space and the amount of temporal discounting characteristic of each participant. Ultimately, this work provides important links between behavioral models of sequence learning and neural activity during the same behavior, and contextualizes these results within a broader framework of domain general cognitive maps.

Indexed as

Spatial NavigationCognitionHumansLearningReaction TimeTemporal Lobecognitive mapsintracranial electroencephalographysequence learning

Identifiers

PMID35105662
PMCPMC8896554
OpenAlexW4220950505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.