Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105658›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception.

Camille Fakche, Rufin VanRullen, Philippe Marque, Laura Dugué

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rhythmic stimulation elicits multiple, concurrent neural responses.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Locally Induced Traveling Waves Generate Globally Observable Traveling Waves.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille FakcheUniversité de Paris, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center Unité Mixte de Recherche 8002, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris F-75006, France camille.fakche@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1846-3076
Rufin VanRullenCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CerCo, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5549, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse F-31052, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-7716
Philippe MarqueToulouse NeuroImaging Center, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1214, INSERM Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Toulouse F-31024, France.
Laura DuguéUniversité de Paris, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center Unité Mixte de Recherche 8002, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris F-75006, France.
Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition · FRCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) · MAInserm · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) have been associated with various cognitive functions, including perception. Their phase and amplitude independently predict cortical excitability and subsequent perceptual performance. However, the causal role of α phase-amplitude tradeoffs on visual perception remains ill-defined. We aimed to fill this gap and tested two clear predictions from the pulsed inhibition theory according to which α oscillations are associated with periodic functional inhibition. (1) High-α amplitude induces cortical inhibition at specific phases, associated with low perceptual performance, while at opposite phases, inhibition decreases (potentially increasing excitation) and perceptual performance increases. (2) Low-α amplitude is less susceptible to these phasic (periodic) pulses of inhibition, leading to overall higher perceptual performance. Here, cortical excitability was assessed in humans using phosphene (illusory) perception induced by single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over visual cortex at perceptual threshold, and its postpulse evoked activity recorded with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG). We observed that prepulse α phase modulates the probability to perceive a phosphene, predominantly for high-α amplitude, with a nonoptimal phase for phosphene perception between -π/2 and -π/4. The prepulse nonoptimal phase further leads to an increase in postpulse-evoked activity [event-related potential (ERP)], in phosphene-perceived trials specifically. Together, these results show that α oscillations create periodic inhibitory moments when α amplitude is high, leading to periodic decrease of perceptual performance. This study provides strong causal evidence in favor of the pulsed inhibition theory.

Indexed as

Cortical ExcitabilityVisual CortexAlpha RhythmElectroencephalographyHumansTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual Perceptioncortical excitabilityEEGphase-amplitude tradeoffsTMSvisual perceptionα oscillations

Identifiers

PMID35105658
PMCPMC8868024
OpenAlexW4210593081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.