Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105650›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluation of gender differences in postoperative sore throat and hoarseness following the use of Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask: the randomised controlled LadyLAMA trial study protocol.

Katharina Epp, Uli Przybylski, Carla Luz, Marc Kriege, Eva Wittenmeier, Irene Schmidtmann, Nina Pirlich

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04915534 (Evaluation of Gender Specific Differences in Postoperative Sore Throat Following General Anaesthesia With Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04915534 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Gender Specific Differences in Postoperative Sore Throat Following General Anaesthesia With Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohannes Gutenberg University MainzRan2021 to 2023Enrolled814ConditionsPostoperative Complications, Postoperative PainArmsAmbu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask (LM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina EppAnaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany kathaepp@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-0630
Uli PrzybylskiUniversity Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Carla LuzUniversity Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Marc KriegeAnaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-7908
Eva WittenmeierAnaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Nina PirlichAnaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2885
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative sore throat (POST) is a comparatively minor but very common side effect of general anaesthesia with a supraglottic airway device. The patient considers these side effects a mirror of the quality of anaesthesia. The aims of this study are to evaluate gender-specific differences in the incidence of POST and to assess whether the effects of known risk factors vary between genders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The LadyLAMA trial is a single-centre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthesia with a second generation Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask are randomly allocated to either cuff pressure of 45 cmH2O or cuff pressure of 60 cmH2O. We estimate the difference in POST between the genders at 20% and we hypothesised that a reduction of cuff pressure would reduce POST by 10%. A total of 800 patients will be recruited, with each subgroup including 200 patients to achieve 80% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Primary endpoints are gender differences in the incidence of POST within 24 hours postoperatively, as well as comparison of cuff pressure 45 cmH2O to 60 cmH2O with respect to POST. The main secondary objective is the effect of cuff pressure on POST stratified by gender. Further secondary endpoints are gender-specific differences in POST and hoarseness in postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) at 48 and 72 hours (or until freedom of discomfort). The parameter cuff pressure serves as key-secondary endpoint. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state (Nr. 2021-15835). The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04915534.

Indexed as

HoarsenessLaryngeal MasksPharyngitisAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex Distributionadult anaesthesiaanatomypain management

Identifiers

PMID35105650
PMCPMC8808400
OpenAlexW4210381352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.