Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105628›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Variation in coded frailty syndromes in secondary care administrative data: an international retrospective exploratory study.

John T Y Soong, Sheryl Hui-Xian Ng, Kyle Xin Quan Tan, Jurgita Kaubryte, Adrian Hopper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning Approaches for the Frailty Screening: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John T Y SoongDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore John_Soong@nuhs.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-8505
Sheryl Hui-Xian NgSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Kyle Xin Quan TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Jurgita KaubryteDr Foster Telstra Health Ltd, London, UK.
Adrian HopperGuy's and Saint Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
National University of Singapore · SGGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChallenges with manual methodologies to identify frailty, have led to enthusiasm for utilising large-scale administrative data, particularly standardised diagnostic codes. However, concerns have been raised regarding coding reliability and variability. We aimed to quantify variation in coding frailty syndromes within standardised diagnostic code fields of an international dataset.

settingPooled data from 37 hospitals in 10 countries from 2010 to 2014.

participantsPatients ≥75 years with admission of >24 hours (N=1 404 671 patient episodes). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Frailty syndrome groups were coded in all standardised diagnostic fields by creation of a binary flag if the relevant diagnosis was present in the 12 months leading to index admission. Volume and percentages of coded frailty syndrome groups by age, gender, year and country were tabulated, and trend analysis provided in line charts. Descriptive statistics including mean, range, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Relationship to in-hospital mortality, hospital readmission and length of stay were visualised as bar charts.

resultsThe top four contributors were UK, US, Norway and Australia, which accounted for 75.4% of the volume of admissions. There were 553 595 (39.4%) patient episodes with at least one frailty syndrome group coded. The two most frequently coded frailty syndrome groups were 'Falls and Fractures' (N=3 36 087; 23.9%) and 'Delirium and Dementia' (N=221 072; 15.7%), with the lowest CV. Trend analysis revealed some coding instability over the frailty syndrome groups from 2010 to 2014. The four countries with the lowest CV for coded frailty syndrome groups were Belgium, Australia, USA and UK. There was up to twofold, fourfold and twofold variation difference for outcomes of length of stay, 30-day readmission and inpatient mortality, respectively, across the countries.

conclusionsVariation in coding frequency for frailty syndromes in standardised diagnostic fields are quantified and described. Recommendations are made to account for this variation when producing risk prediction models.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansLength of StayReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSecondary Health CareSyndromeepidemiologygeriatric medicineinternational health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35105628
PMCPMC8808387
OpenAlexW4210617396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.