Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105626›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Clinical efficacy of diquafosol sodium 3% versus hyaluronic acid 0.1% in patients with dry eye disease after cataract surgery: a protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

Maria Miura, Takenori Inomata, Shuko Nojiri, Jaemyoung Sung, Masashi Nagao, Jun Shimazaki, Akie Midorikawa-Inomata, Yuichi Okumura, Kenta Fujio, Yasutsugu Akasaki and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06034366 (a Parallel Assignment Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of 0.01% Atropine for Near Work-induced Transient Myopia and Myopic Progression), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06034366 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

a Parallel Assignment Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of 0.01% Atropine for Near Work-induced Transient Myopia and Myopic Progression

TypeinterventionalSponsorHe Eye HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsMyopiaArms0.01% atropine, 0.9% sodium chloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Comparison of two treatments for dry eye disease after corneal refractive surgery.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ocular Surface Ion Transport and Dry Eye Disease.Current ophthalmology reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takenori InomataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan tinoma@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-1055
Shuko NojiriMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Jaemyoung SungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi NagaoMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-4650
Jun ShimazakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-3095
Akie Midorikawa-InomataDepartment of Hospital Administration, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi OkumuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenta FujioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutsugu AkasakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Mizu KuwaharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tianxiang HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro NakamuraDepartment of Digital Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7079-0640
Kunihiko HirosawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi FujimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of cataract surgeries, the most common ophthalmic surgery, is expected to increase due to ageing populations. Dry eye disease (DED) is a frequent side effect of cataract surgery, contributing to lower postoperative patient satisfaction and suboptimal quality of vision. It is unclear which eye-drops commonly used in these patients should be recommended for postoperative DED treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy of topical administration of diquafosol sodium 3% vs hyaluronic acid 0.1% eye-drops in patients with DED after cataract surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a single-blind randomised controlled trial. The participants will be randomly (1:1) allocated to either the diquafosol sodium 3% topical administration group (n=21) or the hyaluronic acid 0.1% topical administration group (n=21). Each group will receive its assigned eye-drop intervention over a 12-week period. The primary outcome will be measured using the total score of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index during the visit 5 weeks postoperatively. Both groups will be followed up after their respective eye-drop application for 12 weeks according to the intervention regimens. Secondary outcome measures including meibomian gland function assessment, tear film break-up time, keratoconjunctival staining score, maximum blink interval and tear secretion volume using Schirmer's test I will be assessed at 1, 5, 9, 13 and 25 weeks postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Juntendo Hospital Certified Review Board, Tokyo, Japan (Approved protocol V.7.0 dated 7 May 2021. Approval number: J20-018) and has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. Written informed consent will be collected from every patient prior to study participation. The results of this trial will be presented at local and international meetings and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1031210018.

Indexed as

CataractDry Eye SyndromesHumansHyaluronic AcidOphthalmic SolutionsPolyphosphatesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSodiumTearsTreatment OutcomeUracil NucleotidesdiquafosolHyaluronic AcidOphthalmic SolutionsPolyphosphatesSodiumUracil Nucleotidescataract and refractive surgerycorneal and external diseasesophthalmologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID35105626
PMCPMC8808423
OpenAlexW4210720675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.