Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105618›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Vector control strategies in Brazil: a qualitative investigation into community knowledge, attitudes and perceptions following the 2015-2016 Zika virus epidemic.

Dani Bancroft, Grace M Power, Robert T Jones, Eduardo Massad, Jorge Bernstein Iriat, Raman Preet, John Kinsman, James G Logan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Knowledge about COVID-19 and Associated Factors Early in the Outbreak among the Brazilian Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dani BancroftDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-5818
Grace M PowerDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-7728
Robert T JonesDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK Robert.Jones@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-0881
Eduardo MassadSchool of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jorge Bernstein IriatInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Raman PreetDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
John KinsmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
James G LoganDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUmeå University · SERoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe World Health Organization declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern following the rapid emergence of neonatal microcephaly in Brazil during the 2015-2016 Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic. In response, a national campaign sought to control

designIn 2017, the Zika Preparedness Latin America Network (ZikaPLAN) conducted a qualitative study to understand individual and community level experiences of ZIKV and other mosquito-borne disease outbreaks. Presented here is a thematic analysis of 33 transcripts from community focus groups and semistructured interviews, applying the Health Belief Model (HBM) to elaborate knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of ZIKV and vector control strategies.

participants120 purposively sampled adults of approximate reproductive age (18-45); 103 women participated in focus groups and 17 men in semistructured interviews.

settingTwo sociopolitically and epidemiologically distinct cities in Brazil: Jundiaí (57 km north of São Paolo) and Salvador (Bahia state capital).

resultsFour key and 12 major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) knowledge and cues to action; (2) attitudes and normative beliefs (perceived threat, barriers, benefits and self-efficacy); (3) behaviour change (household prevention and community participation); and (4) community preferences for novel repellent tools, vector control strategies and ZIKV messaging.

conclusionsCommon barriers to repellent adherence were accessibility, appearance and effectiveness. A strong case is made for the transferability of the HBM to inform epidemic preparedness for mosquito-borne disease outbreaks at the community level. Nationally, a health campaign targeting men is recommended, in addition to local mobilisation of funding to strengthen surveillance, risk communication and community engagement.

Indexed as

Zika VirusZika Virus InfectionAdultAnimalsBrazilFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMosquito Vectorsentomologyepidemiologyinfection controlpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35105618
PMCPMC8808399
OpenAlexW4210814846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.