Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105609›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Comprehensive mapping of NICU developmental care nursing interventions and related sensitive outcome indicators: a scoping review protocol.

Marjolaine Héon, Marilyn Aita, Andréane Lavallée, Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugère, Geneviève Laporte, Annie Boisvert, Nancy Feeley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolaine HéonFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada marjolaine.heon@umontreal.ca marjolaine.heon@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7450-1797
Marilyn AitaFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6197-8796
Andréane LavalléeFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-3084
Gwenaëlle De Clifford-FaugèreFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-5531
Geneviève LaporteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-8546
Annie BoisvertFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nancy FeeleyQuebec Network on Nursing Intervention Research/Réseau de Recherche en Interventions en Sciences Infirmières du Québec (RRISIQ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2836-4116
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAJewish General Hospital · CAQuebec Network for Research on Aging · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infant are still a contemporary concern. To counter the detrimental effects resulting from the hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), developmental care (DC) interventions have emerged as a philosophy of care aimed at protecting and enhancing preterm infant's development and promoting parental outcomes. In the past two decades, many authors have suggested DC models, core measures, practice guidelines and standards of care but outlined different groupings of interventions rather than specific interventions that can be used in NICU clinical practice. Moreover, as these DC interventions are mostly implemented by neonatal nurses, it would be strategic and valuable to identify specific outcome indicators to make visible the contribution of NICU nurses to DC.

objectivesThe overarching objective of this review is to identify the nature, range, and extent of the literature regarding DC nursing interventions for preterm infants in the NICU. The secondary twofold objectives are to highlight interventions that fall into identified categories of DC interventions and suggest nursing-sensitive outcome indicators related to DC interventions in the NICU. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers reporting on or discussing a DC nursing intervention during NICU hospitalisation will be included. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and PsycInfo databases from 2009 to the present will be searched. Any type of paper, published in English or French, will be considered. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by pairs of two review authors independently. A qualitative content analysis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No Institutional Review Board ethical approbation is needed. Results of this review will be presented in scientific meetings and published in refereed papers.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsScoping Reviews as Topicneonatal intensive & critical careneonatologyperinatology

Identifiers

PMID35105609
PMCPMC8808373
OpenAlexW4210458222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.