Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105599›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Primary healthcare professionals' perspective on vertical integration of healthcare system in China: a qualitative study.

Shasha Yuan, Fengmei Fan, Joris van de Klundert, Jeroen van Wijngaarden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shasha YuanInstitute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical Colleage, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5091-6688
Fengmei FanPeking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China.
Joris van de KlundertErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen van WijngaardenErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands vanwijngaarden@eshpm.eur.nl.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNErasmus University Rotterdam · NLPeking University · CNPrince Mohammad Bin Salman College of Business and Entrepreneurship · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to present the perspectives of primary healthcare professionals (PHPs) on the impacts of implementation of vertical integration and on the underlying interprofessional collaboration process on achievement of the policy goals in China.

designA qualitative study involving individual interview and group interview was conducted between 2017 and 2018.

settingPrimary healthcare institutions (PHIs) in five counties/districts of China.

participantsThe major participants include 12 heads of PHIs (by 12 individual interviews) and 38 PHPs (by 12 group interviews). We also interviewed other stakeholders including 24 health policy-makers (by 5 group interviews) and 5 hospital leaders (by 5 individual interviews) for triangulation analysis.

resultsOur study indicates that PHPs perceived vertical integration has resulted in improved professional competency, better care coordination and stronger capacity to satisfy patients' needs. The positive impacts have varied between integration types. Contributing factors for such progress are identified at administrative, organisational and service delivery levels. Other perceived effects are a loss of autonomy, increased workload and higher turnover of capable PHPs. Higher level hospitals play a dominant role in the interprofessional collaboration, particularly regarding shared goals, vision and leadership. These findings are different from the evidence in high-income countries. Incentive mechanisms and the balance of power with hospitals management are prominent design elements in the future.

conclusionsOur findings are particularly valuable for other countries with a fragmented health service system and low competency of PHPs as China's experience in integrated care provides a feasible path to strengthen primary care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelChinaHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchhealth policyprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID35105599
PMCPMC8808441
OpenAlexW4210674096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.