Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105576›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol.

Stephen Eu Ruen Lim, Samantha Meredith, Samantha Agnew, Esther Clift, Kinda Ibrahim, Helen Roberts

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04672200 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Physical Activity of Older People in Community Through Trained Volunteers: the ImPACt Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsSedentary BehaviorArmsGroup exercise
NCT05384730 nacompletednot on this map

A Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Virtual Multimodal Intervention Delivered by Volunteers to Improve Functional Outcomes of Frail Older Adults Discharged From Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsFrailty, Malnutrition, Sedentary BehaviorArmsGroup nutrition and exercise support
NCT06017934 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

PIVOT Trial: Promoting Increased Physical Activity in Hospitalised Older Adults With Trained Volunteers: An Implementation Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2024 to 2026Enrolled225ConditionsHospital-associated DeconditioningArmsVolunteer-led physical activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen Eu Ruen LimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK s.e.lim@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-2362
Samantha MeredithAcademic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Samantha AgnewThe Brendoncare Foundation, Winchester, UK.
Esther CliftSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Kinda IbrahimAcademic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Helen RobertsAcademic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
NIHR Research Delivery Network · GBSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBWestCare Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical activity is important for healthy ageing. Despite strong evidence on the benefits of physical activity for health and well-being, physical inactivity remains a significant problem among older adults. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an online volunteer-led group exercise for older adults.

methodsA quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach will be used in this study. A training programme will be developed to train volunteers to deliver online group exercises to older adults aged >65 years (n=30). The primary outcome is the feasibility of implementing the intervention. This will be assessed by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained at the end of the study, and the number of exercise sessions delivered and completed by participants. Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels measured using the Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors questionnaire, Barthel Index, EQ-5D-5L as a measure of health-related quality of life, SARC-F to determine sarcopenia status, and PRIMSA-7 to determine frailty status. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 6 months.Qualitative interviews will be conducted with volunteers(n=5), older adults (n=10) and family members (n=5) to explore their views on the intervention. ANALYSIS: Simple descriptive statistics will be used to describe participant characteristics, the feasibility of the study and the impact of the intervention on health outcomes. Parametric(t-test) or non-parametric(Mann-Whitney U test) statistics will be used to analyse continuous variables. χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Integrity and Governance committee (ID: 52 967 .A1). Study findings will be made available to service users, voluntary organisations and other researchers who may be interested in implementing the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04672200.

Indexed as

FrailtyQuality of LifeAgedExerciseExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansgeriatric medicinequalitative researchrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID35105576
PMCPMC8808406
OpenAlexW4210643521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.