ArticleFertility and sterility2022
Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons: an Ethics Committee opinion.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A non-randomized clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel sperm sex selection technique.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic diseases: A novel paradigm in embryo selection.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in transgender and gender diverse individuals: a SWOT analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Best quality vs. sex selection - an analysis of embryo selection preferences for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy over a 10-year period.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Patient interest in and clinician reservations on polygenic embryo screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Islamic Viewpoints on Opportunistic Sex Selection of IVF Embryos upon doing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Preventing Genetic Diseases.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Divergence Between Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Polygenic Embryo Screening: A Qualitative Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because the practice of preimplantation sex selection is ethically controversial, clinics are encouraged to develop and make available their policies regarding its use. Practitioners offering assisted reproductive services are under no ethical obligation to provide or refuse to provide nonmedically-indicated methods of sex selection. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35105444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.