ArticleSystematic reviews2022
Male involvement in family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Utilization of family planning and associated factors among women with disabilities in ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: male partner involvement in modern family planning and its effect on women's mental health in Northern Ghana - a community-based cross-sectional study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the benefits, facilitators and barriers to male involvement in sexual and reproductive health: a qualitative study of nurses' and midwives' perspectives in Ghana.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Respectful Maternity Care During Facility-Based Childbirth and Its Predictors in Public Health Facilities in Central Ethiopia: A Multidimensional Communication as a Proximal Predictor: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Determinants of men's perspectives on women contraceptive use in Ghana: an analysis of the 2022 Ghana demographic and health survey.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Measurement and conceptualization of male involvement in family planning: a bibliometric analysis of Africa-based studies.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Review
- Factors associated with family planning use among refugee and host populations in Adjumani district, West Nile, Uganda: a comparative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2023Article
- Barriers to Family Planning Service Utilization in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Male Involvement in Family Planning Decisions in Malawi and Tanzania: What Are the Determinants?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Effect of Family Planning Education on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Family Planning Methods Among Married Couples in Kersa and Goma Districts of Jimma Zone, South West Ethiopia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- How to Engage Men in Preconception Health?: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe need to include males who require joint spousal decisions is critical in achieving key reproductive health indicators. Low involvement of males in family planning use is one of the contributing factors for low contraceptive use in Ethiopia. Despite this, there are inconsistent findings on the prevalence and determinants of male involvement in family planning use in Ethiopia. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of male involvement in family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia.
methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be used to develop the protocol. The online databases PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and unpublished gray literature will be searched to retrieve available articles from April 10 to August 11, 2021. The two authors will conduct selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The chi-squared test and I-squared statistic will be used to examine heterogeneity among studies. Sources of heterogeneity will be investigated using subgroup analysis and meta-regression based on regions and residence (urban and rural). Publication bias will be examined by observation using funnel plots and statistically by Begg's and Egger's tests. A random-effects model will be used to estimate the pooled prevalence and its determinants of male involvement in family planning use. DISCUSSION: The role of males in family planning and participation in contraceptive use improves women's uptake and continuity of family planning use. Although there are studies on male involvement in family planning use, there are no synthesis research findings on the pooled prevalence of male involvement in family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia. Therefore, the findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis will help the national health sector transformational plane emphasize the pooled prevalence and its determinants that drive low male involvement in family planning use in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.