Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105323›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

The essential conditions needed to implement the Indigenous Youth Mentorship Program: a focused ethnography.

Frances Sobierajski, Lucie Lévesque, Jonathan McGavock, Tamara Beardy, Genevieve Montemurro, IYMP National Team, Kate Storey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frances SobierajskiSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Lucie LévesqueSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan McGavockDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, 715 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Tamara BeardyDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, 715 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Genevieve MontemurroSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
IYMP National Team
Kate StoreySchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada. kate.storey@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Indigenous Youth Mentorship Program (IYMP) is a 20-week communal, relationship-based afterschool healthy living program for Indigenous youth in Canada. IYMP embraces the Anishnaabe/Nehiyawak concepts of Mino-Bimaadiziwin/miyo-pimâtisiwin ("living in a good way") via its core components of physical activities/games, healthy snacks, and relationship-building. A strength of IYMP is that it values autonomy, adaptability, and the school community context. However, this presents challenges when evaluating its implementation, given that traditional implementation science methods tend to oversimplify the process. In response, essential conditions for the implementation of school-based healthy living programs across diverse contexts have been developed. The purpose of this research was to understand the applicability of these essential conditions within the context of IYMP.

methods15 participants (n = 10 Young Adult Health Leaders; n = 5 coordinators) with experience implementing IYMP in the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Quebec were purposefully sampled. Focused ethnography was the guiding method and one-on-one semi-structured interviews were used as the data generation strategy. The purpose of the interviews was to understand what conditions are needed to implement IYMP. The interview guide was based on previously established essential conditions developed by the research team. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was used to identify patterns in the data.

resultsThe overarching theme that emerged from the interviews was the applicability of the essential conditions when implementing IYMP. Participants felt the eight core conditions (students as change agents, school/community-specific autonomy, demonstrated administrative leadership, higher-level support, dedicated champion(s) to engage school community, community support, quality and use of evidence, and professional development) and four contextual conditions (time, funding and project support, readiness and understanding, and prior community connectivity) were necessary, but made suggestions to modify two conditions (youth led and learning opportunities) to better reflect their experiences implementing IYMP. In addition, a new core condition, rooted in relationship, emerged as necessary for implementation.

conclusionsThis research adds to the literature by identifying and describing what is needed in practice to implement a communal, relationship-based afterschool healthy living program. The essential conditions may support other researchers and communities interested in implementing and rippling similar programs.

Indexed as

MentorsSchoolsAdolescentAlbertaAnthropology, CulturalHumansStudentsYoung AdultComprehensive school healthEssential conditionsHealth promotionImplementation scienceIndigenous healthPeer mentorshipQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35105323
PMCPMC8808991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.