Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105318›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Impact of tanezumab on health status, non-work activities and work productivity in adults with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.

Philip G Conaghan, Lucy Abraham, Lars Viktrup, Paul Cislo

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02697773 phase3completednot on this map

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the analgesic efficacy and safety of a dose titration regimen for the subcutaneous administration of tanezumab in subjects with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2016 to 2018Enrolled698ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, HipArmsPlacebo, Tanezumab 2.5 mg, Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg
NCT02709486 phase3completednot on this map

A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the analgesic efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous administration of tanezumab in subjects with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2016 to 2018Enrolled849ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, KneeArmsTanezumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK. P.Conaghan@leeds.ac.uk.
Lucy AbrahamPfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.
Lars ViktrupEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Paul CisloPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the impact of tanezumab on health status, non-work activities, and work productivity in a pooled analysis of two large phase 3 osteoarthritis (OA) studies.

methodsSubcutaneous tanezumab (2.5 mg and 5 mg) was tested in double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week (NCT02697773) and 24-week (NCT02709486) clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the hip or knee. At baseline and week 16, all patients completed EQ-5D-5L and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-OA (WPAI-OA) activity impairment item. Those currently employed also completed WPAI-OA work time missed, impairment while working, and overall work impairment items. Between-group differences in least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline at week 16 were tested using analysis of covariance.

resultsOf 1545 pooled patients, 576 were employed at baseline. Improvements in EQ-5D-5L index value at week 16 were significantly greater for the tanezumab 2.5-mg group (difference in LS means [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03 [0.01, 0.05]; p = 0.0083) versus placebo. Percent improvements (95% CI) in activity impairment (- 5.92 [- 8.87, - 2.98]; p < 0.0001), impairment while working (- 7.34 [- 13.01, - 1.68]; p = 0.0112), and overall work impairment (- 7.44 [- 13.22, - 1.67]; p = 0.0116) at week 16 were significantly greater for the tanezumab 2.5-mg group versus placebo. Results for the tanezumab 5-mg group were generally comparable to the tanezumab 2.5-mg group, although, compared with placebo, percent improvement (95% CI) in work time missed was significantly greater for the tanezumab 5-mg group (- 3.40 [- 6.47, - 0.34]; p = 0.0294), but not the tanezumab 2.5-mg group (- 0.66 [- 3.63, 2.32]; p = 0.6637).

conclusionsThese pooled analyses showed that health status, non-work activities, and work productivity were significantly improved following tanezumab administration, compared with placebo.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02697773, NCT02709486.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDose-Response Relationship, DrugHealth StatusHumansPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtanezumabDaily activitiesEQ-5DHealth statusNerve growth factorOsteoarthritisWork productivityWPAI

Identifiers

PMID35105318
PMCPMC8809015
OpenAlexW4210554607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.