Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105307›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Effect of topical local anaesthesia on injection pain associated with administration of sterile water injections - a randomized controlled trial.

Lena B Mårtensson, Britt-Marie Gunnarsson, Sandra Karlsson, Nigel Lee, Ingrid Bergh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02213185 (Effect of EMLA® Patches for Reducing Pain Associated With Sterile Water Injections - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02213185 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of EMLA® Patches for Reducing Pain Associated With Sterile Water Injections - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SkövdeRan2014 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsPainArmsEMLA patches
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Anesthetic Cream and Vibration on Injection Pain in Lymphedema.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lena B MårtenssonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden. lena.martensson@his.se.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-3966
Britt-Marie GunnarssonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden.
Sandra KarlssonSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, SE-551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6364-3850
Nigel LeeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work University of Queensland, Chamberlain Building, University of Queensland,, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-5574
Ingrid BerghSchool of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9771-6640
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Skövde · SEJönköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSterile water injections can provide effective pain relief during childbirth, particularly for low back pain related to childbirth. However, the pain associated administering the injections can negatively impact women's impressions of the procedure. It may discourage women from considering repeat doses despite the quality of analgesia experienced. Determining strategies to reduce the pain related to the administration of sterile water injections would improve the acceptability of the technique. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical local anesthesia on the pain associated with administration of sterile water injections.

methodsThe study was designed as a multi-arm single-blind, randomized, controlled trial and 120 female healthy students were randomly divided according to one of four groups. The Intervention group received sterile water injections with topical local anesthesia. Control group 1 received sterile water injections without topical local anesthesia, control group 2 received injections of isotonic saline 0.9% with topical local anesthesia and control group 3 received injections of isotonic saline 0.9% without topical local anesthesia. Pain Immediately after the injections and subsidence in pain were recorded using a visual analogue scale. Sensations in the injection area were reported 15 min and the day after the injections.

resultsThe main finding of this study was that local anesthesia with EMLA® reduces the pain associated with the administration of intracutaneous sterile water injections. There was a significant difference in the self-assessed pain score immediately following the injections between the control (73.3 mm) and intervention groups (50.0 mm), p = 0.001. No adverse side effects were reported.

conclusionLocal anesthesia with EMLA® reduces the pain associated with intracutaneous administration of sterile water injections.

trial registrationThe study was registered 08/07/2014 at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02213185 .

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansInjections, IntradermalPainPain ManagementSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeWaterYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalWaterChildbirthPainPain reliefRandomized controlled trialSterile water injections

Identifiers

PMID35105307
PMCPMC8805377
OpenAlexW4210473918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.