Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105239›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Plants in the UK flower a month earlier under recent warming.

Ulf Büntgen, Alma Piermattei, Paul J Krusic, Jan Esper, Tim Sparks, Alan Crivellaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 30 years of climate related phenological research: themes and trends.International journal of biometeorology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulf BüntgenDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-0818
Alma PiermatteiDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK.
Paul J KrusicDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK.
Jan EsperGlobal Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CzechGlobe), 60300 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tim SparksMuseum of Zoology University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK.
Alan CrivellaroDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global temperatures are rising at an unprecedented rate, but environmental responses are often difficult to recognize and quantify. Long-term observations of plant phenology, the annually recurring sequence of plant developmental stages, can provide sensitive measures of climate change and important information for ecosystem services. Here, we present 419 354 recordings of the first flowering date from 406 plant species in the UK between 1753 and 2019 CE. Community-wide first flowering advanced by almost one month on average when comparing all observations before and after 1986 (

Indexed as

EcosystemFlowersClimate ChangePlantsSeasonsTemperatureUnited KingdomBritish Islescitizen scienceclimate changeecosystem serviceplant phenologywoodland trust

Identifiers

PMID35105239
PMCPMC8808087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.