Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35105236›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Bo-NO-bouba-kiki: picture-word mapping but no spontaneous sound symbolic speech-shape mapping in a language trained bonobo.

Konstantina Margiotoudi, Manuel Bohn, Natalie Schwob, Jared Taglialatela, Friedemann Pulvermüller, Amanda Epping, Ken Schweller, Matthias Allritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. LinkedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Great ape communication as contextual social inference: a computational modelling perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Konstantina MargiotoudiBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, WE4, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9505-3978
Manuel BohnDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-1348
Natalie SchwobDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6151-9568
Jared TaglialatelaApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Friedemann PulvermüllerBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, WE4, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Amanda EppingApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Ken SchwellerApe Cognition and Conservation Initiative, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Matthias AllritzSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans share the ability to intuitively map 'sharp' or 'round' pseudowords, such as 'bouba' versus 'kiki', to abstract edgy versus round shapes, respectively. This effect, known as sound symbolism, appears early in human development. The phylogenetic origin of this phenomenon, however, is unclear: are humans the only species capable of experiencing correspondences between speech sounds and shapes, or could similar effects be observed in other animals? Thus far, evidence from an

Indexed as

HominidaeLanguageAnimalsMalePan paniscusPhoneticsPhylogenySpeechbouba-kikiKanzilanguage evolutionsound symbolism

Identifiers

PMID35105236
PMCPMC8808101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.